Table 5.
Psychological problems profile scores tertiles | Categories of breakfast consuming frequency | P trend | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Seldom (n 205) | Sometimes (n 424) | Always (n 2247) | ||
Men | ||||
Crude model | <0⋅0001 | |||
Lowest tertile | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | |
Intermediate tertile | 1⋅30 (0⋅68, 2⋅49) | 1⋅26 (0⋅86, 1⋅84) | 1 (reference) | |
Highest tertile | 3⋅93 (2⋅21, 6⋅98) | 1⋅43 (0⋅94, 2⋅17) | 1 (reference) | |
Model 1 | <0⋅0001 | |||
Lowest tertile | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | |
Intermediate tertile | 1⋅56 (0⋅73, 3⋅31) | 1⋅26 (0⋅82, 1⋅93) | 1 (reference) | |
Highest tertile | 4⋅76 (2⋅43, 9⋅33) | 1⋅65 (1⋅04, 2⋅63) | 1 (reference) | |
Model 2 | <0⋅0001 | |||
Lowest tertile | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | |
Intermediate tertile | 1⋅59 (0⋅71, 3⋅57) | 1⋅28 (0⋅82, 2⋅00) | 1 (reference) | |
Highest tertile | 5⋅28 (2⋅57, 10⋅84) | 1⋅80 (1⋅12, 2⋅89) | 1 (reference) | |
Model 3 | <0⋅0001 | |||
Lowest tertile | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | |
Intermediate tertile | 1⋅50 (0⋅66, 3⋅41) | 1⋅35 (0⋅86, 2⋅12) | 1 (reference) | |
Highest tertile | 4⋅88 (2⋅26, 10⋅58) | 2⋅02 (1⋅21, 3⋅37) | 1 (reference) | |
Model 4 | <0⋅0001 | |||
Lowest tertile | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | |
Intermediate tertile | 1⋅49 (0⋅66, 3⋅39) | 1⋅31 (0⋅83, 2⋅07) | 1 (reference) | |
Highest tertile | 5⋅00 (2⋅29, 10⋅90) | 1⋅98 (1⋅18, 3⋅30) | 1 (reference) | |
Women | ||||
Crude model | <0⋅0001 | |||
Lowest tertile | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | |
Intermediate tertile | 1⋅40 (0⋅84, 2⋅32) | 1⋅14 (0⋅78, 1⋅66) | 1 (reference) | |
Highest tertile | 3⋅13 (1⋅99, 4⋅93) | 2⋅62 (1⋅88, 3⋅67) | 1 (reference) | |
Model 1 | <0⋅0001 | |||
Lowest tertile | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | |
Intermediate tertile | 1⋅63 (0⋅93, 2⋅85) | 1⋅23 (0⋅82, 1⋅84) | 1 (reference) | |
Highest tertile | 3⋅36 (2⋅02, 5⋅61) | 2⋅76 (1⋅92, 3⋅97) | 1 (reference) | |
Model 2 | <0⋅0001 | |||
Lowest tertile | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | |
Intermediate tertile | 1⋅66 (0⋅92, 2⋅99) | 1⋅17 (0⋅77, 1⋅79) | 1 (reference) | |
Highest tertile | 3⋅53 (2⋅06, 6⋅04) | 2⋅72 (1⋅86, 3⋅96) | 1 (reference) | |
Model 3 | <0⋅0001 | |||
Lowest tertile | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | |
Intermediate tertile | 1⋅57 (0⋅87, 2⋅86) | 1⋅15 (0⋅75, 1⋅75) | 1 (reference) | |
Highest tertile | 2⋅97 (1⋅68, 5⋅22) | 2⋅55 (1⋅71, 3⋅80) | 1 (reference) | |
Model 4 | <0⋅0001 | |||
Lowest tertile | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) | |
Intermediate tertile | 1⋅47 (0⋅80, 2⋅68) | 1⋅06 (0⋅69, 1⋅62) | 1 (reference) | |
Highest tertile | 2⋅75 (1⋅55, 4⋅89) | 2⋅36 (1⋅58, 3⋅53) | 1 (reference) |
Multinomial logistic regression model was used.
Model 1: Age, marital status and education were adjusted. Model 2: Additional adjustments were done for weight, smoking and physical activity. Model 3: Further controls were done for psychotropic medicines use and gastrointestinal disorders were made Model 4: Additional adjustment for dietary intakes including magnesium, riboflavin, pyridoxine, folate, cobalamin, Docosahexaenoic acid and Eicosapentaenoic acid, energy, fibre and caffeine.