Table 7.
Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adjusted estimate (-value) | Adjusted estimate (-value) | Adjusted estimate (-value) | Adjusted estimate (-value) | |
212 | 212 | 104 | 51 | |
0.08 | 0.40 | 0.55 | 0.66 | |
Country | ||||
Ghana | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Mali | 0.53 (0.30) | 0.41 (0.24) | 0.84 (0.29)** | 1.15 (0.45)* |
Niger | 0.78 (0.33)* | 0.19 (0.28) | — | — |
Water system type | ||||
Handpump | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Public tap | 0.17 (0.27) | (0.23) | (0.38) | (0.58)* |
Age of water system | (0.012) | (0.010) | 0.001 (0.013) | (0.028) |
Stagnation time | () | () | (0.002) | (0.002) |
pH | 0.005 (0.004) | 0.002 (0.003) | 0.024 (0.18) | (0.26) |
Conductivity | (0.0004)* | () | () | () |
Log copper | — | 0.43 (0.04)*** | 0.39 (0.05)*** | 0.48 (0.09)*** |
Log lead in flushed samples (groundwater) | — | — | 0.36 (0.14)* | (0.21) |
Brass component | — | — | — | 1.34 (0.45)** |
Note: All models were run using the regress command in STATA. Model 1 (base model) is a simple linear regression of log lead concentration as a function of country, system type, system age, stagnation time, and water sample pH, and conductivity. Model 2 is based on Model 1 but also controls for log copper concentration in water samples. Model 3 is based on Model 2 but also controls for log lead concentration in flushed groundwater samples from sampled sources. Model 4 is based on Model 3 but includes a dummy variable for the presence of one or more brass components identified in the water system. In each model, the -value given is the -value associated with the -value calculated as the mean square model divided by the mean square residual. In each model, the comparator is designated by the abbreviation Ref. —, not applicable; Ref, referent. *; **; ***.