Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 21;134:104401. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104401

Table 5.

A comparison of Our model with previous approaches for COVID-19 Classification.
  • (c) In case the null hypothesis is rejected, the performance of our model is statistically different from the other model. We consider it to be a win for our model if the mean accuracy value of our model is greater than that of the competing model. We denote it be a •. Otherwise, it's a loss for our model. We denote it by a ◦.
  • (d)
    If t-test does not reject the null hypothesis, the performance of our model is not statistically different from the other model and we consider it to be a tie. A tie will be represented by no symbol.
Approach Classes COVID-19
Images
Balanced
Dataset?
5-folds CV? Statistical
Comparison?
Tuning Hyper parameters? Accuracy
Our Model 4 1000 98.45%
Covid-Net [35] 3 180 × × × × 93.3%
CoroNet [64] 4 284 × × × × 89.6%
XGB [86] 4 130 × × × 79.52%
DELT [87] 4 305 × × × 90.13%
COVID-ResNet [74] 4 68 × × × × 96.23%