Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 20;11:227. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01324-8

Table 4.

Significance* of difference in mean marker values and direction of dysregulation in the more severe group in intergroup comparison for top 5 RF importanta biomarkers.

RF S2 vs. S1 S1 vs. HCs S2 vs. HCs PTSD cases vs. HCs
# markers retained in RF 10 23 37 48
hsa.miR.93.3p <0.001 (4) ▼ <0.001 (1) ▼
cg01882498 0.003 (1) ▼
cg01208318 <0.001 (4) ▼ <0.001 (2) ▼
cg20720918 <0.001 (1) ▼ <0.001 (3) ▼
cg13034868 0.001 (1) ▼
hsa.miR.106b.3p <0.001 (2) ▼ <0.001 (4) ▼
lactate <0.001 (3) ▲
cg23594345 <0.001 (2) ▼ <0.001 (5) ▼
cg15687973 0.001 (3) ▼
cg18171204 0.594 (2)
hsa.miR.127.3p <0.001 (5) ▼
cg03267026 0.002 (5) ▲
cg06751007 0.211 (3)
eosino 0.106 (4)
APOF.SGV 0.023 (5)

▼ = for significant markers, downregulated in more severe group based on comparison of mean values.

▲ = for significant markers, upregulated in more severe group based on comparison of mean values.

*FWER, Bonferroni corrected p < 0.0025, p-value bolded.

a() = importance rank in RF.