Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 27.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2020 Nov 20;65(23):10.1088/1361-6560/abc363. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abc363

Table 4.

Mean DSC (%) and standard deviation (in parentheses) of the proposed method with different registration algorithms for generating pseudo-labels. All the experiments employ 10 TCIA scans as moving images and 50 UTSW scans as fixed images.

Test set Registration algorithm Mandible Parotid-R Parotid-L Submand-R Submand-L
TCIA Rigid registration 51.5 (±11.7) 59.1 (±11.3) 58.3 (±12.5) 54.8 (±10.9) 52.8 (±8.9)
DIR 87.9 (±2.5) 73.4 (±6.9) 73.4 (±6.9) 61.0 (±7.6) 63.2 (±8.8)
UTSW Rigid registration 41.5 (±13.2) 43.7 (±12.2) 50.9 (±12.0) 29.4 (±19.4) 31.5 (±16.5)
DIR 84.5 (±3.9) 62.1 (±11.4) 68.1 (±10.9) 42.0 (±29.1) 54.4 (±19.1)