Table 3.
Total cranium dataset Kmult = 0.1328, p = 0.001 |
Facial patch dataset Kmult = 0.1724, p = 0.001 |
Neurocranial patch dataset Kmult = 0.1181, p = 0.001 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Function | Df | R2 | F | Z | p | R2 | F | Z | p | R2 | F | Z | p |
Pcoords ~ ln(Csize) | 1.55 | 0.353 | 29.977 | 4.839 | 0.001 | 0.262 | 19.521 | 3.905 | 0.001 | 0.443 | 43.701 | 4.887 | 0.001 |
Pcoords ~ clade | 2.54 | 0.003 | 0.069 | − 4.680 | 1.000 | 0.003 | 0.072 | − 4.187 | 1.000 | 0.003 | 0.077 | − 3.893 | 1.000 |
Pcoords ~ prey/predator mass ratio | 1.54 | 0.130 | 8.041 | 3.214 | 0.005 | 0.094 | 5.577 | 2.434 | 0.007 | 0.088 | 5.205 | 2.432 | 0.014 |
Pcoords ~ dietary category (coarse) | 2.53 | 0.028 | 0.763 | − 0.084 | 0.498 | 0.016 | 0.441 | − 0.874 | 0.800 | 0.077 | 2.214 | 1.514 | 0.087 |
Pcoords ~ dietary category (fine) | 9.46 | 0.136 | 0.805 | − 0.287 | 0.591 | 0.124 | 0.721 | − 0.592 | 0.721 | 0.208 | 1.339 | 0.781 | 0.217 |
ln(Csize) ~ clade | 2.54 | 0.001 | 0.023 | − 2.409 | 0.973 | 0.001 | 0.023 | − 2.307 | 0.969 | 0.001 | 0.031 | − 2.189 | 0.968 |
ln(Csize) ~ prey/predator mass ratio | 1.54 | 0.111 | 6.749 | 1.467 | 0.019 | 0.089 | 5.294 | 1.373 | 0.029 | 0.116 | 7.077 | 1.515 | 0.019 |
ln(Csize) ~ dietary category (coarse) | 2.53 | 0.084 | 2.432 | 1.163 | 0.106 | 0.091 | 2.655 | 1.182 | 0.080 | 0.087 | 2.528 | 1.167 | 0.105 |
ln(Csize) ~ dietary category (fine) | 9.46 | 0.175 | 1.086 | 0.366 | 0.354 | 0.198 | 1.263 | 0.567 | 0.288 | 0.183 | 1.146 | 0.437 | 0.329 |
Multivariate phylogenetic signal test (Kmult) results indicate low but significant signal in each dataset. All significant results after Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment (α = 0.10) in bold