Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2020 Apr 29;204(4):734–740. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001095

Table 1:

Demographic, clinical, imaging, and pathology data

Patient characteristics (n=57)
Age (years)
 Mean (SD) 61.7 (7.0)
PSA (ng/ml)
 Median (Interquartile range (Q1–Q3)) 15.0 (7.4–27.6)
NCCN Risk Stratification
 Intermediate-unfavorable risk 4 (7.0)
 High risk 35 (61.4)
 Very high risk 18 (31.6)
Post-operative Grade Group* n (%)
 2 (Gleason score 3+4) 9 (15.0)
 3 (Gleason score 4+3) 11 (18.3)
 4 (Gleason score 4+4, 3+5, 5+3) 1 (1.7)
 5 (Gleason scores 4+5, 5+4,5+5) 35 (58.3)
Total number of excised lymph nodes 2480
 Median per patient (Interquartile range (Q1–Q3)) 40.0 (33.5–51.5)
[18F]fluciclovine PET/CT positivity rate (N1 ± M1) n (%) 21 (36.8)
 Positivity rate per risk group:
 Intermediate-unfavorable risk (n=4) 2 (50.0)
 High risk (n=35) 12 (34.3)
 Very high risk (n=18) 7 (38.9)
Metastatic disease based on truth (N1 ± M1) n (%) 31 (54.4)
 Metastatic disease per risk group:
 Intermediate-unfavorable risk (n=4) 2 (50.0)
 High risk (n=35) 17 (48.6)
 Very high risk (n=18) 12 (66.7)
*

n=56 patients that had radical prostatectomy