Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 17;288(1947):20210212. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0212

Table 2.

Results of model averaging of candidate models that were within AICc Δ7 of the model with the lowest AICc value.

response variable fixed effects remaining in the averaged model estimate adjusted SE z-value p-value
CV total pollinator abundance models with CV calculated across all years of the studies
conditional R2 = 0.33; marginal R2 = 0.09
same dominant species −0.08482 0.03802 2.231 0.0257*
H' index −0.15584 0.03932 3.964 7.38 × 10−5***
climatic region 0.08302 0.09064 0.916 0.3598
MFC −0.08627 0.08326 1.036 0.3001
models with CV calculated for every two years of the studies
conditional R2 = 0.35; marginal R2 = 0.06
same dominant species −0.05286 0.03726 1.418 0.15607
H’ index −0.10368 0.03792 2.734 0.00626**
climatic region 0.11703 0.08691 1.347 0.17812
MFC −0.10889 0.03726 1.322 0.18609
CV of pollinator species richness models with CV calculated across all years of the studies
conditional R2 = 0.56; marginal R2 = 0.19
climatic region  0.16877 0.08576 1.968 0.049096*
CV of most dominant speciesa 0.09774 0.02957 3.305 0.000951***
H’ index −0.16173 0.02879 5.616 <2 × 10−16***
MFC 0.00435 0.11645 0.037 0.970190
models with CV calculated for every two years of the studies
conditional R2 = 0.37; marginal R2 = 0.09
climatic region 0.111412 0.079390 2.138 0.032545*
CV of most dominant speciesa 0.121180 0.032136 3.771 0.000163***
H’ index −0.048424 0.037559 2.242 0.024961*
MFC 0.002177 0.051874 0.073 0.942094

aCV of most dominant species remained significant when it was the single most dominant, two-most dominant as well as three-most dominant species.