Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: Annu Rev Criminol. 2017 Oct 13;1:471–495. doi: 10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-091915

Table 3.

County coverage in the state court processing statistics (SCPS), 1990–2009

County Percent of waves includeda
Maricopa, AZ; Los Angeles, CA; San Bernardino, CA; Broward, FL; Dade, FL; Cook, IL; Wayne, MI; Bronx, NY; Kings, NY; Shelby, TN; Dallas, TX; Harris, TX 100
Pima, AZ; Orange, CA; Santa Clara, CA; Honolulu, HI; Essex, NJ; Philadelphia, PA 80
Hillsborough, FL; Marion, IN; Montgomery, MD; St Louis, MO; New York, NY; Hamilton, OH; Tarrant, TX; Salt Lake, UT; King, WA 70
Jefferson, AL; Alameda, CA; Fulton, GA; Queens, NY; Fairfax, VA; Milwaukee, WI 60
Sacramento, CA; San Diego, CA; Ventura, CA; Orange, FL; Palm Beach, FL; Pinellas, FL; Baltimore (County), MD; Erie, NY; Monroe, NY; Suffolk, NY; Franklin, OH; Allegheny, PA; El Paso, TX 50
San Francisco, CA; Nassau, NY; Montgomery, PA 40
Contra Costa, CA; Riverside, CA; San Mateo, CA; DuPage, IL; Jefferson, KY; Baltimore (City), MD; Jackson, MO; Westchester, NY; Travis, TX 30
Hartford, CT; Washington, DC; Duval, FL; Essex, MA; Suffolk, MA; Prince George, MD; Macomb, MI; Oakland, MI; Wake, NC; Middlesex, NJ; Cuyahoga, OH 20
New Haven, CT; Middlesex, MA 10
a

Authors’ calculations of the SCPS.