Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 3;63(10):3525–3538. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00030

Table 3.

Linear regression models for speech recognition threshold by masker type.

Speech-shaped noise
R2 =.37, F(5, 54) = 7.87, p < .0001
Factor Raw coefficient t value p value
Intercept 0 1.36 .18
Age −1.21 −2.88 < .01
PPVT −0.58 −2.27 .03
Flanker 0.02 0.64 .53
Listening Recall 0.01 0.29 .77
Age × PPVT 0.006 2.17 .04

Amplitude-modulated speech-shaped noise

R2 = .59, F(5, 54) = 18.08, p < .0001
Factor
Raw coefficient
t value
p value
Intercept 0 1.96 .05
Age 2.32 −3.05 < .01
PPVT −0.14 −2.95 < .01
Flanker 0.01 0.20 .84
Listening Recall 0.01 0.26 .79
Age × PPVT 0.01 2.31 .02

Two-talker

R2 = .65, F(5, 54) = 22.59, p < .0001
Factor
Raw coefficient
t value
p value
Intercept 0 7.69 < .01
Age −2.85 −6.04 < .01
PPVT −0.13 −4.81 < .01
Flanker −0.07 −2.04 .04
Listening Recall −0.09 −2.05 .04
Age × PPVT 0.02 4.95 < .01

Note. Coefficient for the intercept for each model is zero because all variables were mean centered. Significant factors (p < .05) in each model are bolded. PPVT = Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test; Flanker = NIH Toolbox Flanker task.