Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 21;11:8624. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87581-5

Table 5.

Regression analyses for type 2 resilience.

Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
β p β p β p β p
Educational background 0.12 0.00 0.08 0.40 0.05 0.50
Self-rated health 0.41 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.20 < 0.01
Physical activity 0.09 0.01 0.13 0.03 0.01 0.90 0.07 > 0.05
Relationship satisfaction 0.44 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.23 0.00
Social support 0.13 0.00 0.08 0.22 0.03 0.58
Trust 0.21 0.00 0.11 0.06 0.04 0.48
Anxious attachment − 0.27 0.00 − 0.26 0.00 − 0.21 0.00 0.06 > 0.05
Avoidant attachment − 0.35 0.00 − 0.33 0.00 − 0.24 0.00 − 0.02 > 0.05
Loneliness − 0.31 0.00 − 0.33 0.00 − 0.23 0.00 − 0.09 > 0.05
Positive affect 0.56 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.26 0.00
Meaning in life 0.62 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.30 0.00
Optimism 0.35 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.02 > 0.05
Self-efficacy 0.36 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.13 < 0.05

Significant effects (p < 0.05) in bold type.

N varies between 415 and 888. See Method section and Table 1 for more information.

Model 1: Linear model, standardized, with control for sex and age, for each variable separately.

Model 2: Linear mixed model, standardized, with control for sex, age and genetic confounding, for each variable separately.

Model 3: Linear mixed model, standardized, with control for sex, age, genetic confounding and the other resilience measure, for each variable separately.

Model 4: Multivariate linear mixed model, standardized, with control for sex, age and genetic confounding, with all significant variables from Model 2 included.