Table 2.
Performance of the classifiers with respect to area under receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and false discovery rate on test sets with randomly picked 100 common variants.a
Model | Area under receiver operating characteristic curve | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | F1-score | False discovery rate |
DeepAutism | 0.670 | 0.689 | 0.685 | 0.697 | 0.755 | 0.145 |
Naive Bayes | 0.556 | 0.454 | 0.717 | 0.432 | 0.166 | 0.906 |
Random forest | 0.701 | 0.629 | 0.612 | 0.855 | 0.754 | 0.018 |
Logistic regression | 0.571 | 0.583 | 0.598 | 0.489 | 0.704 | 0.143 |
Support vector machine | 0.672 | 0.679 | 0.633 | 0.571 | 0.696 | 0.139 |
Deep neural network | 0.656 | 0.677 | 0.681 | 0.702 | 0.733 | 0.143 |
aItalicized data show the best performance; the performance of all models became worse on all the metrics with randomly selected common variants.