Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 7;9(4):e24754. doi: 10.2196/24754

Table 2.

Performance of the classifiers with respect to area under receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and false discovery rate on test sets with randomly picked 100 common variants.a

Model Area under receiver operating characteristic curve Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity F1-score False discovery rate
DeepAutism 0.670 0.689 0.685 0.697 0.755 0.145
Naive Bayes 0.556 0.454 0.717 0.432 0.166 0.906
Random forest 0.701 0.629 0.612 0.855 0.754 0.018
Logistic regression 0.571 0.583 0.598 0.489 0.704 0.143
Support vector machine 0.672 0.679 0.633 0.571 0.696 0.139
Deep neural network 0.656 0.677 0.681 0.702 0.733 0.143

aItalicized data show the best performance; the performance of all models became worse on all the metrics with randomly selected common variants.