Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 13;29:e8. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000653

Table 4.

Crude and adjusted ORs for the associations between cyberbullying victimisation and mental health and substance use outcomes among adolescents, OSDUHS, 2015

Self-rated poor mental health Psychological distress Suicidal ideation Suicide attempt Smoking tobacco cigarette Cannabis Binge drinking
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Model 1 3.30 (2.60–4.17)
(N = 5295)
3.63 (2.87–4.60)
(N = 5391)
3.99 (3.26–4.89)
(N = 5188)
4.46 (2.65–7.52)
(N = 5197)
1.90 (1.46–2.47)
(N = 5383)
1.58 (1.26–1.99)
(N = 5391)
1.21 (0.93–1.56)
(N = 5371)
Model 2 2.15 (1.64–2.81)
(N = 5074)
2.41 (1.90–3.06)
(N = 5160)
2.38 (1.83–3.08)
(N = 4991)
2.07 (1.27–3.38)
(N = 4999)
1.96 (1.45–2.65)
(N = 5153)
1.82 (1.32–2.51)
(N = 5160)
1.44 (1.03–2.02)
(N = 5143)
Model 3
Cyberbullying × parent–child relationship
0.79 (0.37–1.69)
(N = 5067)
2.19 (1.06–4.51)
(N = 5153)
0.88 (0.39–1.99)
(N = 4984)
0.51 (0.16–1.60)
(N = 4992)
0.76 (0.39–1.48)
(N = 5149)
0.66 (0.35–1.26)
(N = 5153)
0.53 (0.25–1.14)
(N = 5136)
Model 4
Cyberbullying × sex
1.18 (0.69–2.01)
(N = 5074)
2.69 (1.46–4.98)
(N = 5160)
1.96 (1.03–3.71)
(N = 4991)
0.73 (0.24–2.27)
(N = 4999)
1.31 (0.71–2.39)
(N = 5153)
1.95 (1.20–3.17)
(N = 5160)
1.46 (0.80–2.69)
(N = 5143)

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Model 1 is unadjusted.

Model 2 is adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, subjective socioeconomic status and involvement in physical fighting, bullying victimisation and perpetration at school.

Model 3 is full model for each outcome + interaction term between Cyberbullying and parent–child relationship.

Model 4 is full model for each outcome + interaction term between Cyberbullying and sex.

Bold values represent ORs that are statistically significant at a = 0.05.