Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 29;21(1):88–98. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_373_20

Table 8.

Association of patient’s denture satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life at 3 months with psychological factors of patients, dentist’s communication skills, and technical quality of denture in both experimental and control groups

Variables Patient denture satisfaction scores

Experimental group (n=66) Control group (n=50)


Correlation coefficient P Correlation coefficient P
Psychological factors
Depression −0.174 0.162 −0.190 0.185
Anxiety −0.140 0.262 −0.187 0.194
Stress −0.167 0.180 −0.261 0.067
Self-efficacy 0.368 0.002* −0.113 0.435
Personality domains
Extraversion 0.006 0.961 0.087 0.547
Agreeableness 0.012 0.921 0.201 0.162
Conscientiousness 0.156 0.210 0.170 0.238
Neuroticism −0.166 0.183 −0.170 0.237
Openness −0.003 0.978 −0.040 0.784
Dentist communication skills
Patient rated dentist communication skills (ABIM) 0.652 0.000* 0.577 0.000*
Expert rated dentist communication skills (Kalamazoo) 0.093 0.456 0.110 0.447
Technical quality of denture
Expert rated denture quality (FAD) 0.151 0.227 −0.176 0.221
Variables Oral health-related quality of life scores

Experimental group (n=66) Control group (n=50)


Correlation coefficient P Correlation coefficient P
Psychological factors
Depression 0.147 0.240 0.228 0.111
Anxiety 0.120 0.339 0.137 0.342
Stress 0.113 0.366 0.097 0.504
Self-efficacy −0.222 0.073 −0.226 0.115
Personality domains
Extraversion −0.051 0.683 0.061 0.676
Agreeableness −0.087 0.486 −0.173 0.230
Conscientiousness −0.243 0.049* −0.239 0.094
Neuroticism 0.215 0.083 0.186 0.196
Openness 0.256 0.256 −0.111 0.444
Dentist communication skills
Patient rated communication skills (ABIM) −0.249 0.043* −0.321 0.023*
Expert rated communication skills (Kalamazoo) 0.010 0.939 −0.154 0.287
Technical quality of denture
Expert rated denture quality (FAD) 0.064 0.608 0.167 0.246

FAD: Functional assessment of denture, ABIM: American Board of Internal Medicine. *Significance-P<0.05