Table 2.
Study | Study design | Inclusion criteria | Groups | N | Route | Dose | Outcome | Funding |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kikuchi et al.[9] | RCT | Intractable PHN (pain > 1 year) | IT MP, epidural MP | 14, 15 | IT, epidural | IT: 3 mL of 2% lidocaine and 60-mg MP; Epidural: 5 mL of 2% lidocaine and 60-mg MP (QW*4) | ≥50% global pain relief: IT 92.3% vs. epidural 16.7% (P < 0.01). | The work was performed in the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Hirosaki, and supported in part by grants-in-aid for Scientific Research No. 08457399 (Department of Education, Japan). |
Persistent reductions in pain, lancinating pain, and allodynia for 24 weeks in IT group (P < 0.005). | ||||||||
Kotani et al.[6] | RCT, blinded | Intractable PHN (pain > 1 year) | MP-lidocaine, lidocaine, and no treatment | 89, 91, 90 | IT | 3 mL of 3% lidocaine, 60 mg of MP (QW*4) | ≥50% global pain relief. Greater improvement in the severity of burning and lancinating pain, allodynia, and areas of maximal pain and allodynia in the MP-lidocaine group for 2 years (P < 0.001). | Supported by a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research No. 08457399 from the Ministry of Education, Tokyo, Japan. |
Rijsdijk et al.[7] | RCT | Intractable PHN (pain > 6 months), VAS score ≥ 4 | MP-lidocaine and lidocaine alone | 6, 4 | IT | MP 60 mg, lidocaine 60 mg, or lidocaine 60 mg only (QW*4) | VAS scores for global pain and lancinating pain decreased significantly in lidocaine group. Analgesic use unchanged. *The trial was stopped because of safety concerns and futility of IT MP | None |
IT = intrathecal, MP = methylprednisolone, NS = normal saline, QOW*4 = once every 2 weeks for four times