Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 22;9(5):E749–E755. doi: 10.1055/a-1387-7880

Table 1. Patient characteristics and outcomes.

N Adenoma size (mm) Adenoma pathology Duct involved Intraductal extension (mm) Intraductal pathology RFA sessions (n) Concomitant therapies Biliary stents (n) Follow-up from papillectomy (mo) Follow-up from 1 st RFA (mo)
1 20 HGD with intramucosal adenocarcinoma CBD 6 Adenocarcinoma 1 2 47 46
2 8 LGD CBD 6 LGD 4 APC (4^ session) 2 44 42
3 40 (pedunculated) LGD CBD Present on histology only LGD 1 2 32 31
4 16 HGD CBD Present on histology only LGD 2 APC (2^ session) 2 25 20
5 14 HGD CBD 13 HGD 2 2 24 24
6 16 LGD CBD 6 LGD (serrated) 1 APC 2 23 21
7 18 HGD CBD Present on histology only HGD 1 APC 3 79 20
8 25 LGD CBD + PD 9 + 9 LGD 2 APC 3 20 19
9 17 HGD CBD 14 HGD 1 3 41 13

APC, argon plasma coagulation; HGD, high-grade dysplasia; LGD, low-grade dysplasia; mo, months; CBD, common bile duct; PD, pancreatic duct; RFA, radio frequency ablation.