Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 4;187(1):45–55. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06136-4

Table 3.

Interaction between PDGFRb score and RT treatment in Cox regression analysis

Endpoint PDGFRb score group Univariable RT vs. non-RT HR (95% CI); p value Multivariable RT vs. non-RT incl. grade, age group, subtype HR (95% CI); p value
IBTR, 10 years Low 0.25 (0.11–0.56); p = 0.001 0.29 (0.12–0.67); p = 0.004
Medium 0.25 (0.13–0.48); p < 0.001 0.31 (0.16–0.59); p < 0.001
High 0.61 (0.35–1.05); p = 0.073 0.64 (0.36–1.11); p = 0.110
Interaction PDGFRb score: RT p = 0.153
Any recurrence, 10 years Low 0.50 (0.28–0.89); p = 0.018 0.57 (0.32–1.04); p = 0.067
Medium 0.37 (0.23–0.60); p < 0.001 0.46 (0.28–0.75); p = 0.002
High 0.70 (0.46–1.06); p = 0.089 0.75 (0.49–1.15); p = 0.192
Interaction PDGFRb score: RT p = 0.320
BCSD, 15 years Low 1.05 (0.51–2.18); p = 0.888 1.12 (0.54–2.32); p = 0.768
Medium 0.54 (0.29–1.00); p = 0.051 0.70 (0.35–1.26); p = 0.271
High 0.77 (0.45–1.32); p = 0.338 0.88 (0.51–1.51); p = 0.633
Interaction PDGFRb score: RT p = 0.636

p values are based on Wald test; p values < 0.05 in bold text

IBTR ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, BCSD breast cancer specific death, RT radiotherapy, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval