Summary
Humanized non‐obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency/interleukin‐2 receptor‐γ‐null (NOD/SCID/IL2rγnull) [humanized (huNSG)] mice engrafted with human hematopoietic cells have been used for investigations of the human immune system. However, the epigenetic features of the human regulatory T (Treg) cells of huNSG mice have not been studied. The objective of this study was to clarify the characteristics of human Treg cells in huNSG mice, especially in terms of the epigenetic aspects. We compared the populations, inhibitory molecule expression and suppressive capacity of human Treg cells in spleens harvested from the huNSG mice 120 days after the engraftment of human umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells with human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Histone modifications and enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (Ezh2), an H3K27 methyltransferase, of human Treg cells were quantified in huNSG mice and human PBMCs. The effect of Ezh2 inhibitor on human Treg cells exposed to interleukin (IL)‐6 was also compared between them. Human Treg cells in the spleens of huNSG mice showed an increased proportion among CD4+ T cells, higher expressions of forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3), cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA‐4) and glucocorticoid‐induced tumor necrosis factor‐related protein (GITR), a higher production of IL‐10 and enhanced suppressive capacity when compared with those in human PBMCs. H3K27me3 and Ezh2 were specifically up‐regulated in human Treg cells of huNSG mice in comparison with those of human PBMCs. The decrease in Treg cells induced by IL‐6 exposure was attenuated in huNSG mice when compared with human PBMCs, while the difference between them was cancelled by addition of Ezh2 inhibitor. In conclusion, huNSG mice exhibit functionally augmented human Treg cells owing to enzymatic up‐regulation of H3K27me3.
Keywords: cord blood stem cell transplantation, enhancer of zeste homolog 2 protein, histones, regulatory T lymphocytes
Humanized NOD/SCID/IL2rγnull (huNSG) mice engrafted with human hematopoietic cells exhibited functionally augmented human Treg cells. The higher Treg cell stability in huNSG mice depended on enhanced enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (Ezh2)‐mediated trimethylated histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me3) modification in Treg cells. This is the first report to show the epigenetic features of human Treg cells in huNSG mice.
Introduction
Humanized mice are immunodeficient mice engrafted with human CD34+ hematopoietic cells; these mice provide a powerful tool for in‐vivo investigations of the human immune system [1, 2]. The utility of humanized mice has been widely indicated in a variety of current immunological challenges, such as human–tropic infections, autoimmunity and cancer, for elucidation of the pathological mechanisms and development of new therapeutic strategies [3].
Among several immunodeficient mice used for immune and hematopoietic reconstitution, NOD.Cg‐Prkdcscid IL2rgtmWjl/Sz [non‐obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency/interleukin (IL)‐2 receptor‐γ‐null (NOD/SCID/IL2rγnull; NSG] mice have been reported to lack T, B, and natural killer (NK) cells owing to a deficient common cytokine receptor γ‐chain, resulting in defects in the cytokine signaling essential for the differentiation to these cells, such as IL‐2, IL‐7 and IL‐15 signaling [4, 5]. NSG mice demonstrate more efficient engraftment of human umbilical cord blood CD34+ hematopoietic cells and multi‐lineage differentiation in comparison with other previously described immunodeficient mouse strains.
In terms of T cells, transplant of human CD34+ hematopoietic cells into NSG mice resulted in the development of human CD4+ and CD8+ T cell receptor (TCR)αβ+ T cells and CD4−CD8− and CD8+TCRγδ+ T cells in recipient bone marrow and spleens [6]. These mice also exhibited the phenotypical transition from naive to effector memory T cells and human T helper type 17 (Th17) cell development, together with Th1 and Th2 cell development. Moreover, the diversity of the TCR‐β chain repertoire in humanized NSG (huNSG) mice reached 100% of the human reference samples [7, 8]. Thus, like humans, huNSG mice exhibit a variety of human T cell subsets and diversity of the TCR repertoire.
Among a variety of human T cell subsets, regulatory T (Treg) cells expressing the transcription factor forkhead box protein P3 (FoxP3) have a critical role in the maintenance of immune homeostasis and prevention of autoimmunity [9]. Regarding cancer immunity, it is evoked effectively by suppression of Treg cells, which has been established as a novel immunotherapeutic strategy against cancer by a variety of so‐called immune checkpoint inhibitors [10]. Recently, many studies of Treg cells have focused upon the epigenetic modifications that play a key role in the stability of the Treg cell lineage. Among the epigenetic factors involved in Treg cells, histone modifications that regulate chromatin accessibility could play an essential role in Treg cell development and function via stability of FoxP3 protein expression. For example, trimethylated histone H3 at lysine 4 (H3K4me3) induced by SET and MYND domain 3, an H3K4 histone methyltransferase, is up‐regulated in Treg cells and positively regulates FoxP3 expression via its deposition at the FoxP3 gene locus under inducible Treg‐skewing conditions [11]. Moreover, trimethylated histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me3) induced by enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (Ezh2), an H3K27 methyltransferase of the polycomb repressor complex 2 that controls chromatin condensation, is also up‐regulated upon Treg cell activation to maintain Treg cell stability via indirect transcriptional regulation of FoxP3 [12, 13].
However, only a limited amount of evidence is available related to the development of human Treg cells in huNSG mice [14, 15]. Moreover, the epigenetic modifications of human Treg cells in huNSG mice have not been studied. Comprehensive understanding of the human immune system requires deep knowledge of Treg cell biology. Therefore, to establish huNSG mice as a complete humanized immune system murine model, further analysis of human Treg cells in these mice in comparison with real human references is needed.
Here, we performed analysis, especially in the epigenomic aspects, of human Treg cells developed in huNSG mice engrafted with umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells in comparison with those from human references to examine the adequacy of this model as a humanized immune system murine model.
This is the first report, to our knowledge, to show the role of epigenetic modification in human Treg cells of huNSG mice.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
All research with human samples was performed in compliance with our institutional guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval for this study was obtained from our local ethics committee (Tsukuba Clinical Research and Development Organization) (approval number: H24‐164). An informed consent was obtained from each subject prior to the inclusion in this study.
All experiments associated with mice were performed according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals at Tsukuba University and approved by our local ethics committee (Animal Experiment Committee) (approval no.: 20‐186).
Human umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells
Purified human umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells obtained from five individuals with regular births were provided by the Cell Engineering Division of Riken BioResource Center (Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan).
Mice
NSG mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory and bred at the animal facility of the University of Tsukuba in specific pathogen‐free conditions. Four to 5‐week‐old male mice were sublethally irradiated with 1·0 Gy. Twenty‐four h after the irradiation, 1·0 × 105 human umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells were transferred into the mice via tail vein injection.
Tissue collection from mice
One hundred and 20 days after injection with human umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells, the NSG mice were euthanized by use of isoflurane, and the spleen and thymus were harvested and then disrupted by grinding between frosted glass coverslips, followed by single‐cell suspensions in phosphate‐buffered saline. The spleen cells were hemolysed with 0·16 M of ammonium chloride at room temperature for 5 min.
Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)
PBMCs were isolated from heparinized peripheral venous blood obtained from five human healthy volunteers by use of the Ficoll‐Hypaque gradient (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) and washed with phosphate‐buffered saline.
Human CD4+ T cell isolation
Human CD4+ T cells were isolated from human PBMCs and spleen cells of huNSG mice, which were defined by NSG mice engrafted with human umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells by positive selection using an autoMACS Pro cell separator (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) after magnetic labeling of the targeted cells with anti‐human CD4 MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The purity of the CD4+ T cell populations was > 97%.
Flow cytometry
Staining for human CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, CD27, CD45, CD127, Fc receptor‐like 3 (FcRL3), cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA‐4), glucocorticoid‐induced tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐related protein (GITR), murine mCD45 molecules (all from BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin (Ig) and immunoreceptor tyrosine‐based inhibitory motif domains (TIGIT) (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) was performed for 20 min using a mixture of antibodies. Intracellular staining for human FoxP3, Helios (both from BioLegend) and Ezh2 [Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD), Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA] was performed after fixation and permeabilization using a FoxP3/transcription factor staining buffer set (eBioscience), according to the protocol supplied by the manufacturer. For intracellular staining of IFN‐γ and IL‐10 (BioLegend) following stimulation, phorbol myristate acetate (50 ng/ml), ionomycin (0·5 μg/ml) and GolgiStop (eBioscience) were added during the last 6 h of each culture of CD4+ T cells. For intracellular staining of histone modification, after incubation with the primary antibody against H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 [both are rabbit IgG and from Cell Signaling Technology (CST), Danver, MA, USA], Alexa Fluor 488®‐conjugated anti‐rabbit IgG (CST) was used as the secondary antibody. The samples were analysed with a fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS)Verse flow cytometer (BD), and the data were analysed with FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA). The relative mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) ratio was calculated on the basis of the ratio of the MFI for a marker to the MFI of its isotype control.
In‐vitro suppression assay and cell culture
CD4+CD25− and CD4+CD25− cells were isolated using the SH800 device (Sony, Tokyo, Japan). CD4+CD25− cells, defined as conventional T (Tconv) cells, were labeled with 10 μM CellTrace Violet by use of a CellTrace™ Cell Proliferation Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and then cultured with or without unlabeled CD4+CD25+ cells, defined as Treg cells, at the indicated ratios for 96 h in the presence of Dynabeads human T‐activator CD3/CD28 (Invitrogen) in round‐bottomed 96‐well plates at a density of one bead per cell. The percentage inhibition rate on the proliferation of Tconv cells was calculated as [1‐(CellTrace Violet percentage of Treg cells plus Tconv cells co‐culture/Tconv cells alone)] × 100%. For analysis of cytokine production in Treg cells, the cells were collected after 72 h stimulation with Dynabeads human T‐activator CD3/CD28 for flow cytometry. For the inhibition assay of Ezh2, human CD4+ T cells obtained from human PBMCs and spleens of huNSG mice were cultured under stimulation with Dynabeads human T‐activator CD3/CD28 in the presence of human recombinant IL‐2 (BioLegend) (300 U/ml) with or without human recombinant IL‐6 (BioLegend) (25 ng/ml) or Ezh2 inhibitor (GSK343; Sigma‐Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA); 5 μM) for 72 h.
Statistical analysis
All values are expressed as means ± standard deviations, unless otherwise stated. All tests were two‐sided, and results with probability values < 0·05 were considered significant. The Mann–Whitney test was used to compare two independent continuous variables. Wilcoxon’s signed‐rank test was used to compare the values of the means from two related samples.
Results
Human T cell subsets developed in huNSG mice and humans
Flow cytometric analysis revealed engraftment of human CD45+ cells and development of human CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells in spleens, as observed in the PBMCs of healthy human subjects and development of CD4+ single‐positive (SP) cells, CD8+ SP cells and CD4+CD8+ double‐positive (DP) cells in the thymuses of huNSG mice harvested on day 120 (Fig. 1a). The spleens of huNSG mice exhibited a significantly higher proportion of human CD4+ T cells and a lower proportion of human CD8+ T cells compared with the PBMCs of healthy human subjects (Fig. 1b).
Human Treg cells developed in huNSG mice and humans
Flow cytometric analysis revealed the fraction of human CD4+CD25+CD127lo cells, indicating human Treg cells by their cell surface markers in spleens and thymuses of huNSG mice harvested on day 120 as well as PBMCs of healthy human subjects (Fig. 1c). Another analysis showed the development of human CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Treg cells in spleens of huNSG mice harvested on day 120 as well as PBMCs of healthy human subjects (Fig. 1d). The proportion of human CD25+FoxP3+ Treg cells among CD4+ T cells was higher in the spleens of huNSG mice than in the human PBMCs (Fig. 1e), although there were individual differences in the proportion among the umbilical cord blood donors in huNSG mice (Supporting information, Table S1, Fig. S1a). Although the proportion of human TIGIT+FcRL3+Helios+ cells among CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Treg cells in the spleens of huNSG mice was not significantly different from that in the human PBMCs (Fig. 1f–h), the proportion of human TIGIT+FcRL3+Helios+CD25+FoxP3+ Treg cells in the total CD4+ T cell population was significantly higher in the spleens of huNSG mice than in the human PBMCs (Fig. 1i). The following experiments were conducted on the basis of these observations.
Expression of inhibitory molecules in human Treg cells developed in humanized NSG mice and humans
The expressions of FoxP3, CTLA‐4 and GITR were significantly higher in human CD4+CD25+ Treg cells from the spleens of huNSG mice than in those from human PBMCs (Fig. 2a,b). These expressions were also significantly higher in human CD4+CD25− Tconv cells than in those from human PBMCs (Fig. 2a,b). Moreover, the population of IL‐10‐producing cells identified by IL‐10+IFN‐γ− cells, as well as that of IFN‐γ‐producing cells identified by IL‐10−IFN‐γ+ cells after stimulation of human CD4+CD25+ cells with anti‐CD3/CD28 beads, was significantly higher in the spleens of huNSG mice than in human PBMCs (Fig. 2c–e).
In‐vitro suppression assay comparing the suppressive function of human Treg cells in humanized NSG mice and humans
The purities of human CD4+CD25+ Treg cells and human CD4+CD25− Tconv cells from spleens of huNSG mice or human PBMCs were 95·0% or above (Fig. 3a). Division of human CD4+CD25− Tconv cells from spleens of huNSG mice (Fig. 3b) and human PBMCs (Fig. 3c) determined by dilution of CellTrace Violet was dose‐dependently suppressed by human CD4+CD25+ Treg cells from the respective origin. The inhibition rate of human Treg cells from huNSG mice was significantly higher than that from human PBMCs (Fig. 3d), although there were individual differences in the inhibition rate among the umbilical cord blood donors in huNSG mice (Supporting information, Table S1, Fig. S1b).
Histone modification of human Treg cells in huNSG mice and humans
The histone modification, H3K27me3, was significantly enhanced in human Treg cells from spleens of huNSG mice compared with those from human PBMCs (Fig. 4a,b), while another histone modification, H3K4me3, exhibited no difference between them (Fig. 4c,d). Accordingly, Ezh2 expression up‐regulated specifically in Treg cells compared with Tconv cells was significantly higher in human Treg cells from huNSG mice than in those from human PBMCs (Fig. 4e,f).
Stability of human Treg cells in huNSG mice and humans
The huNSG mice exhibited a significantly higher population of FoxP3+ cells generated among CD4+Ezh2hi cells compared with CD4+Ezh2lo cells (Fig. 5a,b). The decrease in CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Treg cells under the inflammatory condition by exposure to IL‐6 in addition to IL‐2 was significantly attenuated in human CD4+ T cells from huNSG mice compared with those from human PBMCs (Fig. 5c,d). However, the difference between huNSG mice and human PBMCs was cancelled by the addition of Ezh2 inhibitor to IL‐6 (Fig. 5c,d).
Discussion
This is the first report, to our knowledge, to show that huNSG mice established by reconstitution of human umbilical cord blood‐derived CD34+ cells exhibited functionally augmented human Treg cells associated with higher stability that was obtained due to increased H3K27me3 via up‐regulation of Ezh2 in comparison with those in humans. Through our investigation, we found some critical observations concerning some aspects of the behavior of human Treg cells induced in huNSG mice.
First, we found that huNSG mice exhibited an increased population of human CD4+ T cells and a higher proportion of human Treg cells among CD4+ T cells in the spleens compared with human PBMCs. These observations suggested that the development of human CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Treg cells was quantitatively promoted in the primary lymphoid tissues of huNSG mice in comparison with those of adult humans. Even though the thymus of huNSG mice exhibited a lower population of human Treg cells than did the spleen, the definite existence of human thymic Treg cells indicated the same process of human T cell differentiation in the thymus of huNSG mice as in humans. It was also indicated by the thymic components, including human CD4+CD8+ DP cells. Moreover, human CD4+CD25+FoxP3+TIGIT+FcRL3+Helios+ Treg cell fraction was reported to identify bona fide Treg cells distinct from recently activated CD4+ Tconv cells [16]. In this regard, the bona fide Treg cell population was also increased in huNSG mice in comparison with humans. However, the proportion of TIGIT+FcRL3+Helios+ cells among CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Treg cells was not different between them at baseline. In other words, there was no compositional difference in CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Treg cell population between them in this aspect. These observations could be fundamental to all the comparative analyses of the Treg cells in our study.
Secondly, human Treg cells of humanized NSG mice exhibited up‐regulated expression of Treg cell‐associated inhibitory molecules such as FoxP3, CTLA‐4 and GITR and increased production of IL‐10, which is known as an essential inhibitory cytokine in Treg cells in comparison with human PBMCs. Furthermore, although responder T cells of huNSG mice exhibited less division upon stimulation by human CD3/CD28 beads at baseline than those of humans, the inhibition rate of Treg cells in huNSG mice, corrected by the division of responder T cells at baseline, was higher than that in human PBMCs, which was equivalent to previously reported findings under the similar condition [17]. This result suggested that human Treg cells of huNSG mice exhibited an augmented suppressive function by themselves independently of the proliferative ability of responder T cells. Even considering that CD4+CD25+ T cell population in huNSG mice included a higher number of IFN‐γ‐producing cells, this population could have stronger suppressive capacity in comparison with human PBMCs. This qualitative enhancement could be obtained by up‐regulation of the inhibitory molecules noted above. Although there were individual differences in the development and the suppressive function of human Treg cells in huNSG mice among the umbilical cord blood donors, they were augmented in all the huNSG mice engrafted with the CD34+ cells from the different donors in comparison with those in human PBMCs.
Thirdly, and more importantly, the acquisition and maintenance of the inhibitory phenotype in Treg cells require Treg cell‐specific epigenetic modifications [18]. Therefore, we examined the role of the epigenetic modifications in the qualitative and functional enhancement in human Treg cells of huNSG mice.
Among a variety of epigenetic factors in Treg cells, the specific histone modifications, H3K4me3 and H3K27me3, are well known to be involved in the stability of Treg cells, which was proved by loss of the corresponding enzyme genes in Treg cells [11, 13, 19]. Among these, H3K27me3 was specifically up‐regulated in human Treg cells of huNSG mice compared with those of human PBMCs, in contrast to H3K4me3. In accordance with the change in Treg cells, Ezh2, which catalyses the histone modification of H3K27me3, was also increased in Treg cells from huNSG mice compared with those from humans.
H3K27me3 is known as a repressive mark correlated with gene silencing, whereas H3K4me3 is known as a permissive mark correlated with gene activation [20]. Even considering the previous report that showed that there was no H3K27me3 occupancy of the FOXP3 gene locus in Treg cells [21], H3K27me3 might regulate Treg cell stability indirectly. The candidate genes in which H3K27me3 deposition has such an effect by the gene silencing in Treg cells were reported to be some of the proinflammatory genes that antagonize Treg cell function, such as PDE3B [13].
Indeed, FoxP3 expression was strongly maintained in Ezh2‐high‐expressing CD4+ T cells compared with in Ezh2 low‐expressing CD4+ T cells in huNSG mice. This result suggested that Ezh2‐mediated H3K27me3 modification might contribute to the maintenance of FoxP3 expression in human Treg cells of huNSG mice in vivo. Therefore, we examined the effect of Ezh2 inhibitor on the population of Treg cells after the exposure to IL‐6 to clarify the role of Ezh2‐mediated H3K27me3 modification in Treg cell stability under inflammatory conditions in vitro. IL‐6 is known to down‐regulate FOXP3 mRNA expression, and this down‐regulation may be partly explained by an observation that IL‐6 modifies the chromatin structure to break Treg cell stability [22, 23]. The decrease in CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Treg cells, which means the population of so‐called ex‐Treg cells, under the inflammatory condition by IL‐6 exposure was attenuated in huNSG mice compared with in humans. In other words, Treg cell stability seemed to be higher in huNSG mice than in humans. In addition, Ezh2 inhibitor cancelled the difference in Treg cell stability, which meant that the higher Treg cell stability in huNSG mice depended upon enhanced Ezh2‐mediated H3K27me3 modification in Treg cells (Fig. 6).
Ezh2 was reported to be induced in part by CD28‐meditated co‐stimulation in Treg cells to stabilize Treg cell function [13] and constitutively expressed specifically in thymocytes [24]. Therefore, we hypothesized that Ezh2‐inducing mechanisms such as a CD28‐mediated co‐stimulatory signaling pathway could be constitutively strengthened, especially in the thymic microenvironment of huNSG mice. Elucidation of the key pathway involved in up‐regulation of Ezh2 by further analysis of huNSG mice is needed.
Thus, the present study provides novel insights into human Treg cell behavior that complement the comprehensive understanding of the human immune system established in huNSG mice. When huNSG mice are used for in‐vivo analysis of the human immune response in a variety of immunological conditions, such as infection, cancer and autoimmunity, the pathological role of human Treg cells in huNSG mice could also be analysed from another perspective on the basis of our present observations to elucidate the overall mechanism.
In conclusion, this is the first report, to our knowledge, to show that huNSG mice exhibit functionally augmented human Treg cells associated with enzymatic up‐regulation of H3K27me3. Our observations of human Treg cells in huNSG mice could reinforce the utility of these mice for the in‐vivo analysis of the human immune system.
Disclosures
None.
Author contributions
H. Ta., H. Ts., S. A., F. H., I. M. and T. S. designed the study. H. Ta., H. Ts., S. A. and Y. K. performed the experiments. H. Ta. and H. Ts. analysed and interpreted the data. H. Ta., H. Ts. and T. S. contributed to the first draft of the manuscript. T. S. assumed the final responsibility to submit the manuscript for publication. All authors had full access to all the data, carefully reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version.
Supporting information
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr F. Miyamasu for the critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development and a Grant‐in‐Aid for Scientific Research (C) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1. Ito M, Hiramatsu H, Kobayashi K et al. NOD/SCID/gamma(c)(null) mouse: an excellent recipient mouse model for engraftment of human cells. Blood 2002; 100:3175–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Traggiai E, Chicha L, Mazzucchelli L et al. Development of a human adaptive immune system in cord blood cell‐transplanted mice. Science 2004; 304:104–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Holzapfel BM, Wagner F, Thibaudeau L et al. Concise review: humanized models of tumor immunology in the 21st century: convergence of cancer research and tissue engineering. Stem Cells 2015; 33:1696–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ishikawa F, Yasukawa M, Lyons B et al. Development of functional human blood and immune systems in NOD/SCID/IL2 receptor gamma chain(null) mice. Blood 2005; 106:1565–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Shultz LD, Lyons BL, Burzenski LM et al. Human lymphoid and myeloid cell development in NOD/LtSz‐scid IL2R gamma null mice engrafted with mobilized human hemopoietic stem cells. J Immunol 2005; 174:6477–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Shultz LD, Saito Y, Najima Y et al. Generation of functional human T‐cell subsets with HLA‐restricted immune responses in HLA class I expressing NOD/SCID/IL2r gamma(null) humanized mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:13022–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Marodon G, Desjardins D, Mercey L et al. High diversity of the immune repertoire in humanized NOD.SCID.gamma c–/– mice. Eur J Immunol 2009; 39:2136–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Pham HP, Manuel M, Petit N et al. Half of the T‐cell repertoire combinatorial diversity is genetically determined in humans and humanized mice. Eur J Immunol 2012; 42:760–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Wing JB, Tanaka A, Sakaguchi S. Human FOXP3(+) regulatory T cell heterogeneity and function in autoimmunity and cancer. Immunity 2019; 50:302–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Shitara K, Nishikawa H. Regulatory T cells: a potential target in cancer immunotherapy. Ann NY Acad Sci 2018; 1417:104–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Nagata DE, Ting HA, Cavassani KA et al. Epigenetic control of Foxp3 by SMYD3 H3K4 histone methyltransferase controls iTreg development and regulates pathogenic T‐cell responses during pulmonary viral infection. Mucosal Immunol 2015; 8:1131–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Arvey A, van der Veeken J, Samstein RM et al. Inflammation‐induced repression of chromatin bound by the transcription factor Foxp3 in regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol 2014; 15:580–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. DuPage M, Chopra G, Quiros J et al. The chromatin‐modifying enzyme Ezh2 is critical for the maintenance of regulatory T cell identity after activation. Immunity 2015; 42:227–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Billerbeck E, Barry WT, Mu K et al. Development of human CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in human stem cell factor‐, granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor‐, and interleukin‐3‐expressing NOD‐SCID IL2Rγ(null) humanized mice. Blood 2011; 117:3076–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Serr I, Fürst RW, Achenbach P et al. Type 1 diabetes vaccine candidates promote human Foxp3(+)Treg induction in humanized mice. Nat Commun 2016; 7:10991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bin Dhuban K, d'Hennezel E, Nashi E et al. Coexpression of TIGIT and FCRL3 identifies Helios+ human memory regulatory T cells. J Immunol 2015; 194:3687–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Guo H, Xun L, Zhang R et al. Stability and inhibitory function of Treg cells under inflammatory conditions in vitro . Exp Ther Med 2019; 18:2443–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ohkura N, Sakaguchi S. Transcriptional and epigenetic basis of Treg cell development and function: its genetic anomalies or variations in autoimmune diseases. Cell Res 2020; 30:465–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Yang XP, Jiang K, Hirahara K et al. EZH2 is crucial for both differentiation of regulatory T cells and T effector cell expansion. Sci Rep 2015; 5:10643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. He H, Ni B, Tian Y et al. Histone methylation mediates plasticity of human FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells by modulating signature gene expressions. Immunology 2014; 141:362–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wei G, Wei L, Zhu J et al. Global mapping of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 reveals specificity and plasticity in lineage fate determination of differentiating CD4+ T cells. Immunity 2009; 30:155–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Yang XO, Nurieva R, Martinez GJ et al. Molecular antagonism and plasticity of regulatory and inflammatory T cell programs. Immunity 2008; 29:44–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lal G, Zhang N, van der Touw W et al. Epigenetic regulation of Foxp3 expression in regulatory T cells by DNA methylation. J Immunol 2009; 182:259–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Su IH, Dobenecker MW, Dickinson E et al. Polycomb group protein ezh2 controls actin polymerization and cell signaling. Cell 2005; 121:425–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.