Table 3.
Effects of individually changing the RAP parameters in each of the 16 models of the control population.
| Population | Normal | Alternans | Silencing | Alt+Silenc | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GCaL(1) | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| ImaxNCX(2) | 37.5 | 31.25 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 6.25 |
| ImaxNaK(3) | 37.5 | 0 | 62.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Serca2a density (4) | 87.5 | 12.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| RyR Po (5) | 62.5 | 0 | 37.5 | 0 | 0 |
| RyR density (6) | 0 | 0 | 31.25 | 0 | 68.75 |
| Calcium buffering strength (7) | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full RAP remodeling (8) | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Each row corresponds to one of the eight RAP populations, and the values correspond to % incidence of each type of calcium wave patterns in the population.