Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 20;9:e11297. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11297

Table 3. Relationships of craniofacial morphology with the differences in cleft type and surgeons.

(A) Patient distribution according to the cleft type
Cleft in hard & soft palate Cleft in soft palate Total
Cluster A 3 5 8
Cluster B 9 3 12
Cluster C 11 5 16
Total 23 13 36

Note:

P2) = 0.27, effect size; w = 0.457, post-hoc power; (1−β) = 0.725.