Table 3.

Binary Regression Analyses of Sociodemographics and Violence Across Different Contexts on Psychological Functioning in Adolescents.

	Hopelessness		Suicidal Ideation
	OR	99% CI	OR	99% CI
Step 1
Gendera	1.03	[0.70, 1.50]	1.91	[1.23, 2.97]
Mixed heritageb,a	0.41	[0.26, 0.66]	1.77	[1.01, 3.09]
Whiteb	0.25	[0.12, 0.55]	1.05	[0.43, 2.58]
Dwelling	0.97	[0.54, 1.73]	1.03	[0.50, 2.11]
Peri-urbana	0.83	[0.51, 1.35]	0.39	[0.20, 0.75]
Father employment	0.86	[0.55, 1.34]	0.71	[0.43, 1.19]
Step 2
Gendera	1.07	[0.72, 1.59]	2.12	[1.33, 3.39]
Mixed heritageb,a	0.50	[0.31, 0.82]	2.57	[1.40, 4.73]
Whiteb	0.28	[0.13, 0.64]	1.61	[0.62, 4.19]
Dwelling	1.05	[0.57, 1.92]	0.96	[0.46, 2.00]
Peri-urbana	0.89	[0.54, 1.45]	0.38	[0.19, 0.74]
Father employment	0.86	[0.54, 1.36]	0.77	[0.45, 1.31]
Indirect home victimization	1.20	[0.90, 1.59]	1.18	[0.86, 1.62]
Indirect school victimization	0.89	[0.68, 1.16]	0.87	[0.64, 1.18]
Indirect community victimization	0.69	[0.46, 1.03]	0.95	[0.60, 1.52]
Direct community victimizationb,a	2.48	[1.26, 4.89]	3.76	[1.82, 7.76]
Indirect political victimizationb	1.05	[1.01, 1.10]	1.03	[0.99, 1.08]

Note. OR = odds ratio.

^asignificant variables for suicidal ideation.

^bsignificant variables for hopelessness.