Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 23;397(10286):1725–1735. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00790-X

Table 2.

Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine, between Dec 7, 2020, and Feb 5, 2021 (n=23 324)

Total person-time, days Number of PCR positives Incidence density per 10 000 person-days Unadjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) Adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI)
Full cohort
Unvaccinated 710 587 977 14 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
Dose 1 87 278 71 8 0·43 (0·23–0·64) 0·30 (0·15–0·45)
Dose 2 20 978 9 4 0·23 (0·06–0·40) 0·15 (0·04–0·26)
Negative cohort
Unvaccinated 442 605 902 20 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
Dose 1 59 748 66 11 0·33 (0·17–0·49) 0·28 (0·14–0·42)
Dose 2 14 746 8 5 0·18 (0·04–0·31) 0·14 (0·03–0·24)
Positive cohort
Unvaccinated 267 982 75 3 .. ..
Dose 1 27 530 5 2 .. ..
Dose 2 6232 1 2 .. ..

We calculated cumulative vaccine effectiveness after suitable intervals (21 days post-first dose and 7 days post-second dose) to focus on infections acquired since vaccination after a sufficient interval for biological protection. Unadjusted includes vaccine effect (period) only. The full model was adjusted for site as a random effect, period, and eight fixed effects: age, gender, ethnicity, comorbidities, job role, frequency of contact with COVID-19 patients, employed in a patient facing role, and occupational exposure. There was insufficient information to model the positive cohort separately so stratified hazard ratios are not available for the positive cohort.