Table 2.
Reduction in Rescue Medication Use and Improvement in Dyspareunia by Elagolix Dose in Two Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Clinical Trials
Parameter | Elaris EM-I |
Elaris EM-II |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Placebo | Elagolix, 150 mg once daily | Elagolix, 200 mg twice daily | Placebo | Elagolix, 150 mg once daily | Elagolix, 200 mg twice daily | |
Score for dyspareuniaa | ||||||
At 3 months | ||||||
No. of women | 246 | 171 | 153 | 226 | 145 | 150 |
Change in score | –0.29 ± 0.04 | –0.39 ± 0.05 | –0.49 ± 0.05 | –0.30 ± 0.04 | –0.39 ± 0.05 | –0.60 ± 0.05 |
Difference from placebo | — | –0.09 ± 0.07 | –0.20 ± 0.07b | — | –0.09 ± 0.07 | –0.30 ± 0.07c |
Use of rescue analgesic agentd | ||||||
At 3 months | ||||||
No. of women | 329 | 226 | 213 | 312 | 204 | 209 |
Change in score | –0.29 ± 0.03 | –0.29 ± 0.04 | –0.55 ± 0.04 | –0.31 ± 0.03 | –0.36 ± 0.04 | –0.49 ± 0.03 |
Difference from placebo | — | –0.01 ± 0.05 | –0.26 ± 0.05c | — | –0.05 ± 0.04 | –0.18 ± 0.04c |
At 6 months | ||||||
No. of women | 288 | 198 | 182 | 273 | 185 | 187 |
Change in score | –0.27 ± 0.04 | –0.35 ± 0.04 | –0.56 ± 0.05 | –0.32 ± 0.03 | –0.40 ± 0.04 | –0.52 ± 0.04 |
Difference from placebo | — | –0.07 ± 0.06 | –0.28 ± 0.06c | — | –0.08 ± 0.05 | –0.21 ± 0.05c |
Use of rescue opioidd | ||||||
At 3 months | ||||||
No. of women | 329 | 226 | 213 | 312 | 204 | 209 |
Change in score | –0.10 ± 0.02 | –0.07 ± 0.03 | –0.22 ± 0.03 | –0.12 ± 0.02 | –0.12 ± 0.02 | –0.21 ± 0.02 |
Difference from placebo | — | 0.03 ± 0.04 | –0.12 ± 0.04b | — | 0.00 ± 0.03 | –0.08 ± 0.03b |
Reproduced with permission from Taylor et al.26 Data are least-squares means ± SE.
Pain scores range from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and were recorded in a daily electronic diary. Scores on the scale for dyspareunia were analyzed for women who recorded data other than “not applicable” at baseline and at one or more measurements after baseline.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001.
The use of rescue NSAIDs or opioids was based on average pill counts.
SE, standard error.