Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 26;9(3):655–664. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00275-2

Table 5.

Overall variability of the objective function and corresponding optimal screw patterns for each curve. When the optimum is unique, the corresponding screw pattern is bolded; when more than one screw pattern resulted to be optimal, their frequency distribution over the 11 tested correction objectives is reported as a percentage

Patient Avg ± SD [min; max] Max–min Optimal screw patterns
#1 0.1 ± 0.0 [0.1; 0.2] 0.1 CA: 55%; CPAD:45%
#2 0.1 ± 0.0 [0.1; 0.2] 0.1 CPAD
#3 0.1 ± 0.0 [0.0; 0.2] 0.2 B
#4 0.3 ± 0.1 [0.2; 0.8] 0.7** A: 73%; CPAD: 27%
#5 0.2 ± 0.1 [0.1; 0.4] 0.3 CA
#6 0.1 ± 0.0 [0.1; 0.2] 0.1 CA: 73%; B: 27%
#7 1.3 ± 0.7 [0.4; 3.3] 2.9 CA
#8 0.1 ± 0.0 [0.1; 0.2] 0.1** A: 64%; CPAD: 27%; CA: 9%
#9 0.2 ± 0.1 [0.1; 0.4] 0.3 CPAD
#10 0.1 ± 0.0 [0.1; 0.2] 0.1 CPAD: 91%; CA: 9%

The double asterisk ("**") indicates the maximum variability of objective function output, while a single asterisk ("*") indicates when the variability is greater than the average value calculated over all ten cases