Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 1;11(4):255. doi: 10.3390/membranes11040255

Table 8.

Comparison of the transport properties of the membranes in the pervaporation dehydration of ethanol.

Membranes Membrane Type Water Content in Feed, wt.% Temperature,
°C
Permeation Flux,
kg/(m2 h)
Separation Factor,
(β)
Reference
SA-5HF/PANCaCl2-5LblPSS/SA supported 4 22 0.185 239,760 This study
PVA/PS * hollow fiber membrane supported 5 50 0.06 53 [82]
SA-5HF/PANCaCl2-5LblPSS/SA supported 12 22 0.568 73,326 This study
Polyacrylic acid
sodium-NaA zeolite/PAN
supported 10 30 0.533 436 [83]
DETA-TMC */CA * supported 10 25 0.860 1116 [84]
DAPL-SCC */mPAN supported 10 25 0.600 264 [85]
PAA-PA/PAN supported 10 25 0.830 1791 [86]
PA-nanoNaX zeolite/mPAN supported 10 25 4.500 30 [87]
30 bilayers of CS/graphene oxide on mPAN supported 10 70 2.350 3390 [88]
SA/PFSA */ceramic supported 15 75 0.821 5661 [89]
SA-5HF/PANCaCl2-5LblPSS/SA supported 20 22 0.785 39,996 This study
PVA-maleic acid/PES supported 20 60 0.444 13 [90]
CS-PVA/PAN supported 20 60 1.500 40 [91]
PVA-zeolite 4A (20%)/PAN supported 23.57 60 0.936 710 [92]

* PS: polysulfone; CA: cellulose acetate; DETA: diethylenetriamine; TMC: trimesoyl chloride; DAPL: 1,3-diamino-2-propanol; SCC: succinyl chloride; PFSA: perfluorinated sulfonic acid.