Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 30;9(4):357. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9040357

Table 2.

Virtual screening affinity predictions (Kd and ΔGbind) for the top-ranked and the experimentally tested flavonoid compounds, and the respective biological activities.

Virtual Screening a Biological Activity b
Ranking Compound Kd (nM) ΔGbind (kcal/mol) % Accumulation (10 µM) % Accumulation (20 µM)
1 25 1.16 −7.7 n.d. n.d.
2 37 1.27 −9.0 n.d. n.d.
14 10 3.49 −9.5 111.2 ± 12.0 142.5 ± 30.2
15 3 3.80 −9.9 102.3 ± 4.2 111.3 ± 11.0
25 4 9.62 −8.2 95.5 ± 8.5 90.9 ± 8.9
31 7 14.3 −10.1 122.3 ± 23.4 129.5 ± 17.6
32 5 15.3 −9.4 112.5 ± 23.1 114.5 ± 9.4
33 1 16.8 −9.5 97.3 ± 4.3 107.9 ± 10.1
34 2 17.8 −9.3 97.3 ± 3.7 99.7 ± 9.1
40 9 26.0 −9.4 105.9 ± 3.7 129.6 ± 31.9
42 8 28.4 −9.4 106.7 ± 13.1 115.3 ± 23.0
44 6 36.6 −9.9 119.3 ± 22.9 127.2 ± 17.6
Best lignan c Lig-(+)-4 17.5 −7.6 n.d. 283 ± 33 (Lig-1) d
Worst lignan c Lig-11 359.8 −7.3 n.d. 125 ± 17 (Lig-11) d
(R)-vera
(S)-vera
0.74
0.46
−7.9
−7.3
137.7 ± 6.2 147.5 ± 7.7
239 ± 30 d

a The compounds are ranked by the predicted Kd affinity scores (from NNscore) with cluster 5, while the respective ΔGbind (from AutoDock Vina) is presented for comparison; b intracellular doxorubicin accumulation (in %) in HL60/MDR cells is the mean value ± SD from at least four independent experiments performed in duplicate, after pretreatment with the flavonoids at a concentration of 10 µM and 20 µM; c for comparison, the best and worst results obtained in the training set of lignans and verapamil are presented (compound specified in brackets); d from ref. [24] with 25 µM of inhibitor instead of 20 µM. The significant biological activities are highlighted in bold; n.d. means “not determined”.