Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 1;12(4):316. doi: 10.3390/insects12040316

Table 2.

Number of egg masses (N. EM) and eggs (N. E) for Halyomorpha halys collected in the different survey areas (methods a and b), showing percentage of parasitized egg masses (PEM) and parasitized eggs (PE), and resulting parasitism rate (PR) for Trissolcus japonicus (A), Trissolcus mitsukurii (B) and Anastatus bifasciatus (C), calculated on egg masses from which only one parasitoid species had emerged.

A. Trissolcus japonicus
Country Region/Canton N. EM N. E PEM (%) PE (%) PR (Mean ± SE)
Italy Piedmont 1788 46,824 4.03 2.98 89.43 ± 2.97
Veneto 669 16,966 0.45 0.29 100.00 ± 0.00
Switzerland Basel 26 625 53.85 50.88 80.25 ± 6.95
Zürich 25 673 32.00 25.41 71.43 ± 10.19
B. Trissolcus mitsukurii
Country Region/Canton N. EM N. E PEM (%) PE (%) PR (Mean ± SE)
Italy Emilia Romagna 629 16,707 3.66 2.75 97.40 ± 1.68
Friuli-Venezia Giulia 589 13,874 20.20 14.49 96.21 ± 1.38
Piedmont 1788 46,824 0.17 0.09 91.23 ± 8.77
Trentino-Alto Adige 585 15,506 5.98 4.15 96.70 ± 2.92
Veneto 669 16,966 6.88 4.66 88.59 ± 3.27
C. Anastatus bifasciatus
Country Region/Canton N. EM N. E PEM (%) PE (%) PR (Mean ± SE)
Italy Emilia Romagna 629 16,707 19.55 2.36 66.06 ± 2.78
Friuli-Venezia Giulia 589 13,874 0.85 0.35 44.89 ± 19.54
Piedmont 1788 46,824 15.72 7.79 73.97 ± 1.92
Trentino-Alto Adige 585 15,506 11.97 5.62 76.09 ± 3.69
Veneto 669 16,966 1.05 0.62 68.32 ± 15.15
Switzerland Basel 26 625 3.85 3.36 75.00
Zürich 25 673 4.00 0.15 3.57