Table 2. aMRS vs. sMRS summary.
| protein | N | tsMRS | taMRS | R | Ri | Rj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d1lcka1 | 54 | 6.26 | 0.03 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 |
| d1ntxa | 60 | 7.18 | 0.05 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| d1fxla2 | 82 | 11.22 | 0.07 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| d1bxva | 91 | 12.44 | 0.07 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 |
| d2acya | 98 | 18.08 | 0.07 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 |
| d1jiaa | 122 | 18.77 | 0.12 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 |
| d1hmta | 131 | 21.16 | 0.11 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 |
| d1a4fb | 146 | 26.02 | 0.18 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 |
| d1mcta | 223 | 54.08 | 0.37 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 |
| d2l8ma | 405 | 180.91 | 1.47 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 |
Note:
N: protein length; tsMRS: CPU time of sMRS in seconds; taMRS: CPU time of aMRS in seconds. Convergence measures at M = 200 mutations per site: R: correlation coefficient between sMRS and aMRS sensitivity matrices; Ri: correlation between sensitivity profiles; Rj: correlation between influence profiles.