Table 3. Factors influencing the efficiencies of viral and physical/mechanical transfection methods.
Virus transduction | Physical/mechanical transfection methods | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Electroporation | Laser beam | Nucleic acid injection | Ultrasound-assisted | Magnet-assisted | ||
Factors affecting transfection efficiencies | (1) Virus type/generation (2) Cell type (3) Promoter present in viral vector (4) Presence of other substances during transduction |
(1) Electroporation condition (duration and voltage used) (2) Number of electric pulses (3) Cell type (4) Electroporation buffer composition (5) Size and concentration of nucleic acids |
(1) Laser condition (power density and duration) (2) Number of laser pulses (3) Cell type |
(1) Number of injection repeat (2) Amount of injected nucleic acids (3) Size, shape and coating of needle (4) Cell type |
(1) Ultrasound exposure condition (2) Number of pulses (3) Cell culture condition (4) Cell type (5) Amount of nucleic acids used |
(1) Magnetic condition (oscillating or static conditions) (2) Modification of the magnetic nanoparticles (3) Number of pulses 4) Cell type |
References | (Haas et al., 2000; Ikeda et al., 2002; Denning et al., 2013) | (Potter & Heller, 2003; Molnar et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2009; Hornstein et al., 2016; Chopra et al., 2020; Sherba et al., 2020) | (Stevenson et al., 2006; Terakawa et al., 2006; Tsen et al., 2009) | (Wells et al., 1998; Dahlhoff et al., 2012; Mellott, Forrest & Detamore, 2013; Chow et al., 2016) | (Ogawa, Tachibana & Kondo, 2006; Kinoshita & Hynynen, 2007; Zhou et al., 2012) | (Mykhaylyk et al., 2007; Fouriki et al., 2010; Kardos & Rabussay, 2012; Wang et al., 2014) |