Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 8;18(8):3893. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083893

Table 3.

Domains and themes related to conducting community-engaged research (CEnR) at an academic learning health system (aLHS).

Domains Themes
Conceptualization and Purpose of CEnR
  • CEnR is a collaborative approach to research with translational impact that is both local and generalizable.

  • CEnR can be implemented across the many facets of an aLHS.

  • “Community” often is difficult to define.

  • CEnR is meant to strengthen connections within the community, build resilience and capacity, and reduce the effects of marginalization while improving community and population health.

Value and Investment in CEnR: Institutional, Professional, and Personal
  • CEnR is underappreciated within and not well understood by institutions and by major funding agencies (e.g., NIH and CDC).

  • Community engagement is of personal and professional value, which strengthens commitment to authentic engagement.

Community-Academic Partnerships
  • Engagement differs by community and is influenced by the extent to which communities feel marginalized and how communities perceive research, investigators, and institutions.

  • Partnerships, how they function, and the roles partnership members play in CEnR vary across investigators and across projects.

  • Partnerships must value, respect, and learn how to harness and balance the expertise of the community and the academic partners.

  • CEnR takes time.

  • Forming community-academic partnerships may require “relationship repair” to overcome barriers associated with mistrust and/or previous harms committed in the name of research.

Sustainability of CEnR
  • Partnerships should not end when the funding ends.

  • Achieving sustainability can be difficult.

  • Sustainability is influenced by the strength and quality of engagement throughout a project, and how well community partners were incorporated into various phases of the research process.

Facilitators of CEnR
  • Institutional support enhances the ability to conduct CEnR by providing funding, protected time, and respect for community engagement as a valid and important approach to research and health care.

  • Having research resources such as an NIH Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) reinforces CENR as integral to the academic mission.

  • An Institutional Review Board that understands and is willing to learn the nuances of CEnR approaches.

Challenges of CEnR
  • Burn out and strain are possible.

  • Differences in community and academic priorities and goals can impede CEnR efforts, strain relationships, and make it more difficult to collaborate.

  • Institutional and community history influence how well partnerships can be formed and maintained.