Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 8;8(4):287. doi: 10.3390/children8040287

Table 2.

Limbs’ characteristics at baseline evaluation.

Limbs’ Characteristics Idiopathic (N = 151) MO a (N = 33) p-Value *
Affected side, n (%) 0.85
  Left 75 (50) 17 (52)
  Right 76 (50) 16 (48)
Radiographic Parameters
MAD b, mm Mean (SD) 8.8 (10.6) 17.9 (10.0) <0.001
MAD, % Mean (SD) 11.8 (13.7) 27.7 (17.1) <0.001
aLDFA c, degree (°) Mean (SD) 79.7 (2.8) 80.5 (4.4) 0.047
mLDFA d, degree (°) Mean (SD) 85.3 (2.5) 85.8 (3.4)) 0.27
MPTA e, degree (°) Mean (SD) 90.2 (2.8) 95.1 (4.7) <0.001
HKA f, degree (°) Mean (SD) 3.4 (3.1) 8.0 (4.1) <0.001
x-Ray femur, cm Mean (SD) 48.3 (4.5) 41.4 (4.5) <0.001
x-Ray tibia, cm Mean (SD) 38.8 (3.7) 32.3 (3.8) <0.001
x-Ray fibula, cm Mean (SD) 38.5 (3.6) 30.8 (3.8) <0.001
Tibia/fibula ratio Mean (SD) 1.01 (0.01) 1.05 (0. 04) <0.001
Femur/tibia ratio Mean (SD) 1.24 (0.04) 1.28 (0.06) <0.001
Surgical Variables
Site of stapling, n (%) <0.001
  Distal femur 120 (79.2) 8 (24.2)
  Proximal tibia 20 (13.2) 21 (63.6)
  Distal femur and proximal tibia 8 (5.3) 2 (6.1)
  Other g 3 (2) 2 (6.1)
Duration of correction, month Mean (SD) 14.3 (5.5) 24.7 (9.2) <0.001

a MO: multiple osteochondromas; b MAD: mechanical axis deviation; c aLDFA: anatomical lateral distal femoral angle; d mLDFA: mechanical lateral distal femoral angle; e MPTA: medial proximal tibial angle; f HKA: hip–knee–ankle angle; g Other cases included the association of tibial medial hemiepiphysiodesis and femoral distal epiphysiodesis (two limbs) and tibial proximal epiphysiodesis and femoral medial hemiepiphysiodesis (three limbs); * p-values: Mann–Whitney U test (Wilcoxon) for continuous variables, χ2 or exact Fisher test for categorical variables.