Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 8;10(4):803. doi: 10.3390/foods10040803

Table 6.

Profiles of consumers segments (n = 328) with mean scores of variables within the groups.

n Label of
Consumers
Profiles
% Edu Food Consumption Attitudes Pasta Consumption Attitudes
Health
Aspects
Food
Neophobia
Food Technology
Neophobia
Type of
Pasta
Italian Pasta
Tradition
Attributes of Pasta Functional Pasta
1 Healthy and traditional consumer 7.71 0.74 7.36 4.55 4.09 1.10 7.36 6.83 5.80
2 Refractory consumer 5.56 0.58 5.29 3.15 2.20 1.07 3.89 4.87 5.55
3 Neophobic and traditional consumer 4.75 0.51 2.29 6.86 3.18 1.35 7.14 7.34 6.31
4 Healthy, technophobic, and traditional consumer 43.23 0.60 8.39 4.59 6.51 1.10 8.70 8.34 7.33
5 Healthy and expert consumer 28.10 0.94 8.73 5.62 6.03 0.44 3.16 9.38 8.02
6 Neophobic and critical consumer 3.64 0.11 4,23 8.28 5.43 0.71 3.87 5.67 3.14
7 Neophobic consumer 7.01 0.28 2.84 8.73 3.08 1.10 2.71 2.34 2.29
The whole sample 100.00 0.90 6.58 5.17 4.41 1.07 6.67 6.68 6.77

Legend: Edu = education of respondent: 0 = low education; 1 = high education level. For health aspects, food neophobia, food technology neophobia, Italian pasta tradition, attributes of pasta, and functional pasta, ten-point Likert scales have been used (1: totally disagree, to 10: totally agree). The periodicity values for other types of pasta are coded as 0 = never; 1 = once a month; 2 = once a week; 3 = twice a week; 4 = more than twice a week; 5 = every day.