Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Syst. 2021 Mar 4;12(4):324–337.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2021.02.001

Figure 2. Impact of Gβγ composition on their dissociation from the plasma membrane and GPCR signaling efficacy.

Figure 2.

A, Schematic presentation of the BRET assay to monitor the dissociation of Venus-Gβγ from the plasma membrane. The high density of Venus-Gβγ-containing heterotrimer and Nluc-Flag-K-Ras on the plasma membrane causes a high BRET signal. Membrane dissociation of Venus-Gβγ upon G protein activation decreases the density of Venus-Gβγ, lowering the BRET signal. B and C, Real-time monitoring of the membrane dissociation of Venus-Gβγ. HEK293T/17 cells were transfected with D2R, GαoA, Venus 156-239-Gβ1, and Nluc-Flag-K-Ras, together with twelve different Venus 1-155-Gγ isoforms individually. Dopamine (100 μM) was applied, and the BRET signal was followed across time (B). Dissociation rates were plotted as a bar graph (C). D, The time course of G protein activation (dark blue) and Venus-Gβγ dissociation (red) of Gγ1-containing Go. For comparison, the membrane dissociation of Venus-Gβγ was inverted. E, An alignment of all human Gγ subunits. Structural motifs, conformational switch (CS) and poly-basic residues (PB), etc. were highlighted on the alignment. Sequence swapped between Gγ1 and Gγ2 for chimeras were also shown at the bottom of the alignment. F and G, Venus intensity, membrane dissociation rates, and maximum BRET amplitude of Gγ1 and Gγ2 chimeras. Mean ± SEM from three independent experiments are shown as bar graphs (C, F, and G). Statistics: One-way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s LSD multiple-comparison post hoc test was carried out (n = 3 biological replicates using independent transfections) (C, F, and G): * P ≤ 0.05; ** P ≤ 0.01; *** P ≤ 0.001; **** P ≤ 0.0001.