Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2021 Feb 27;60(5):e221–e229. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.12.008

Table 3.

Comparative Associations of Covariates and Adolescents’ Well-Care Use Classes for Males

Males Engaged vs Gradually-reengaged vs
Gradually-reengaged Persistently-disengaged Persistently-disengaged
Covariates b (SE) OR b (SE) OR b (SE) OR
Birth cohort −0.15 (0.06) * 0.86 −0.24 (0.03) ** 0.79 −0.08 (0.06) 0.92
NH Black vs all others (NH White and Hispanic) −1.15 (0.27) ** 0.32 −0.81 (0.18) ** 0.44 0.34 (0.28) 1.40
Hispanic vs all others (NH Black and NH White) −0.89 (0.38) * 0.41 −0.12 (0.18) 0.89 0.77 (0.41) 2.16
Urban vs non-urban residence −0.13 (0.25) 0.88 −0.46 (0.15) ** 0.63 −0.36 (0.24) 0.70
Mother’s education level 0.34 (0.17) * 1.40 −0.19 (0.09) * 0.83 −0.53 (0.17) ** 0.59
Insured vs not insured 0.22 (0.59) 1.24 −0.73 (0.19) ** 0.48 −0.95 (0.54) 0.39

Note: Covariates were added as predictors of the class structure. Boldface indicates statistical significance (*p<0.05; **p<0.005). Birth cohort and mother’s education at child’s birth were entered as continuous variables. Health insurance refers to insurance coverage when participants were age 5. Race/ethnicity, as assessed in the publicly available data, was contrast coded into the variables of “Non-Hispanic White”/”Non-Hispanic Black”, and “Hispanic”. Each variable compares the identified race/ethnicity to all other individuals in the dataset. For example, individuals identifying as “Hispanic” are compared to all other individuals in the sample who identified as “Non-Hispanic White” or “Non-Hispanic Black”.

b=unstandardized logit; NH, non-Hispanic.