Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 15;23(3):624–639. doi: 10.1007/s10903-021-01151-5

Table 3.

Visual Display of Outcomes Table

Study Study Type Study Size Study Aim Depression Anxiety PTSD Clinically significant?
Barrett et al. (2000) Controlled Trial 20 Preventative ↓ *
Ellis et al. (2012) Case-series 30 Preventative
Entholt et al. (2005) Controlled Trial 28 Preventative  ↔  ↓ **
Fox et al. (2005) Case-Series 58 Preventative ↓ *
Gormez et al. (2017) Case-Series 32 Treatment ↓ ** ↓ **
O’Callaghan et al. (2015) Controlled Trial 50 Treatment ↓ ** ↓ ** ↓ **
Ooi et al. (2016) Controlled Trial 82 Preventative ↓ **
Pfeiffer et al. (2017) Case-Series 29 Treatment ↓ **
Pfeiffer et al. (2018) Randomised controlled trial 50 Treatment ↓ * ↓ **
Sarkadi et al. (2017) Case Series 46 Treatment ↓ * * ↓ *
Schottelkorb et al. (2012) Controlled Trial 31 Treatment ↓ **
Tsoupas (2011) Controlled Trial 21 Preventative
Unterhitzenberger et al. (2015) Case-Series 6 Treatment ↓ * *
Unterhitzenberger and Rosner (2016) Case-Study 1 Treatment
Unterhitzenberger et al. (2019) Case-Series 26 Treatment ↓ ** ↓ *
Vickers (2005) Case-Study 1 Treatme Treatment

In Table 5 the arrows denote the direction of change in the mental health outcome measures following CBT, with a downfacing arrow denoting a reduction in mental health symptoms. The * signifies a statistically significant result whereby p ≤ 0.05 and ** signifies a statistically significant result whereby p ≤ 0.01. Where post-intervention scores became sub-clinical, this was counted as a clinically significant change