Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 9;10(8):1584. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081584

Table 1.

Characteristics of the total population and of subgroup according cardiovascular risk and comparisons variables between subgroups (general information, laboratory tests, echocardiography).

Variable Total Population
n = 931
Cardiovascular Risk Class
Low n = 429 (46.1%) Moderate n = 212 (22.8%) High n = 126 (13.5%) Very High n = 164 (17.6%)
Age, years 49.1 ± 15.5 35.7 ± 8.4 abc 54.9 ± 7.7 ade 61.1 ± 10.1 bdf 67.7 ± 7.5 cef
Male sex, n 402 (43.2) 155 (36.1) c 90 (42.5) e 56 (44.4) f 101 (61.6) cef
BPs, mmHg 124.4 ± 17.7 116.2 ± 14.2 abc 125.9 ± 15.0 ae 130.6 ± 16.5 bf 139.1 ± 18.0 cef
BPd, mmHg 81.7 ± 10.1 78.7 ± 9.1 abc 84.0 ± 9.6 a 84.0 ± 11.1 b 85.0 ± 10.1 c
BP ≥ 140 and/or ≥90 mmHg 253 (27.2) 57 (13.3) abc 63 (29.7) ae 49 (38.9) b 84 (51.2) ce
HR, bpm 72.3 ± 10.9 73.9 ± 10.4 abc 71.0 ± 10.8 a 70.9 ± 10.7 b 70.8 ± 12.0 c
Laboratory tests
NT-proBNP, pg/mL 89.4 ± 190.3 52.9 ± 47.4 abc 74.6 ± 72.6 ae 98.8 ± 96.6 bf 192.0 ± 408.8 cef
hs-TnT, pg/mL 7.4 ± 5.1 5.4 ± 1.9 abc 7.2 ± 4.2 ade 8.5 ± 6.1 bdf 10.5 ± 7.2 cef
Fasting glucose, mg/dL 102.1 ± 21.0 94.4 ± 9.4 abc 104.1 ± 21.4 ae 107.9 ± 23.9 bf 115.1 ± 29.9 cef
OGTT 120 min glucose, mg/dL 124.3 ± 39.7 110.0 ± 27.8 abc 129.1 ± 35.9 ae 137.2 ± 46.7 bf 154.7 ± 49.9 cef
Fasting insulin, µUI/mL 12.3 ± 7.6 10.9 ± 6.8 abc 13.5 ± 8.0 a 12.6 ± 6.2 b 14.1 ± 9.3 c
OGTT 120 min Insulin, µUI/mL 64.8 ± 64.3 52.4 ± 50.2 abc 72.2 ± 58.6 a 71.5 ± 61.5 b 89.9 ± 100.2 c
HbA1 c, % 5.5 ± 0.7 5.2 ± 0.42 abc 5.7 ± 0.6 ae 5.8 ± 0.7 bf 6.1 ± 0.9 cef
HOMA –IR 3.2 ± 2.8 2.6 ± 1.9 abc 3.7 ± 4.0 a 3.4 ± 2.2 b 4.1 ± 3.2 c
Fasting C-peptide, ng/mL 2.6 ± 1.1 2.2 ± 1.0 abc 2.8 ± 1.1 a 2.7 ± 1.0 b 2.9 ± 1.3 c
OGTT 120 min C-peptide, ng/mL 8.8 ± 3.8 7.7 ± 3.1 abc 9.9 ± 3.7 a 9.5 ± 3.9 b 10.6 ± 4.7 c
TC, mg/dL 192.5 ± 40.8 181.0 ± 32.8 abc 199.3 ± 31.1 ad 214.9 ± 48.7 bdf 196.7 ± 53.0cf
LDL-C, mg/dL 124.4 ± 37.8 113.9 ± 30.0 abc 130.8 ± 28.6 a 143.5 ± 47.6 bf 129.1 ± 48.5 cf
HDL-C, mg/dL 62.6 ± 17.3 64.1 ± 16.1 c 62.5 ± 19.6 61.8 ± 16.1 59.2 ± 18.0 c
TG, mg/dL 113.2 ± 77.6 96.6 ± 82.4 abc 122.9 ± 70.1 a 137.0 ± 75.2 b 125.7 ± 66.1 c
hsCRP, mg/l 1.7 ± 4.2 1.3 ± 3.2 abc 2.0 ± 5.0 a 1.8 ± 3.7 b 2.3 ± 5.3 c
Creatinine, μmol/L 70.9 ± 14.9 69.5 ± 14.6 bc 69.0 ± 15.0 de 73.1 ± 14.2 bd 75.0 ± 15.3 ce
CrCl, mL/min 115.0 ± 40.7 126.6 ± 42.8 abc 116.3 ± 40.2 ade 102.2 ± 33.3 bd 92.7 ± 26.8 ce
Echocardiography
LVEF Biplane, % 58.5 ± 5.7 59.6 ± 5.3 bc 58.7 ± 5.2 e 57.8 ± 5.5 b 55.9 ± 6.9 ce
LVMI, g/m2 77.4 ± 20.5 68.5 ± 16.5 abc 80.9 ± 18.2 ae 83.6 ± 19.6 bf 92.0 ± 22.4 cef
LVMI, ≥95 g/m2 women, ≥115 g/m2 men 84 (9.3) 9 (2.1)abc 25 (12.1)a 17 (14.3)b 33 (21.3)c
LAVI, mL/m2 22.6 ± 7.0 20.6 ± 5.7 abc 23.5 ± 7.0 a 24.0 ± 6.7 b 25.6 ± 8.6 c
LAVI, >34 mL/m2 * 53 (6.2) 6 (1.5) abc 15 (7.7) a 11 (9.6) b 21 (14.2) c
Diastolic dysfunction * 105 (11.4) 20 (4.7) abc 22 (10.5) ae 19 (15.2) b 44 (27.7) ce

The data is shown as n (%), mean ± SD. BP: blood pressure; BPd: diastolic blood pressure; BPs: systolic blood pressure; bpm: beats per min; CrCl: creatinine clearance using Cockcroft-Gault Equation; HbA1 c: hemoglobin A1 c; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HR: heart rate; hs-CRP; high- sensitivity C-reactive protein; hs-TnT: high-sensitivity troponin T; kg: kilogram; LAVI: left atrial volume index; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein; mmHg, millimeters of mercury; LVEF Biplane: left ventricular ejection fraction biplane Simpson’s method; LVMI: left ventricular mass index; m2: square meter; NT-proBNP: n-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; SD: standard deviation; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; Comparisons variables between subgroups, the same letters in each row (a: between low and moderate CV risk classes; b: between low and high CV risk classes; c: between low and very-high CV risk classes; d: between moderate and high CV risk classes; e: between moderate and very-high CV risk classes; f: between high and very-high CV risk classes) represent significant differences at p < 0.05. * Diastolic dysfunction of left ventricle was assessed based on the latest recommendations [13]. No significant differences between the moderate and high risk groups are shown in bold.