Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 9;10(8):1584. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081584

Table 2.

Characteristics of the total population and of subgroup according cardiovascular risk and comparisons variables between subgroups (anthropometric measurements, body composition analysis, subjective well-being).

Variable Total Population
n = 931
Cardiovascular Risk Class
Low
n = 429 (46.1%)
Moderate
n = 212 (22.8%)
High
n = 126 (13.5%)
Very high
n = 164 (17.6%)
Anthropometric measurements and body composition analysis
BMI, kg/m2 26.8 ± 5.0 24.8 ± 4.4 abc 28.4 ± 5.0 a 28.5 ± 4.2 b 28.7 ± 4.6 c
BMI < 25 kg/m2 330 (35.4) 224 (52.2)abc 49 (23.1) a 24 (19.0) b 33 (20.1) c
BMI 25–29.99 kg/m2 352 (37.8) 146 (34.0) 91 (42.9) 52 (41.3) 63 (38.4)
BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 249 (26.7) 59 (13.8)abc 72 (34.0) a 50 (39.7) b 68 (41.5) c
Body mass, kg 77.2 ± 16.2 73.6 ± 16.2 abc 80.3 ± 16.1 a 80.8 ± 14.7 b 80.1 ± 15.2 c
Height, cm 169.6 ± 9.9 171.8 ± 9.6 abc 168.2 ± 9.7 a 168.2 ± 10.7 b 166.8 ± 9.2 c
Waist, cm 87.0 ± 13.5 80.5 ± 11.7 abc 90.9 ± 12.1 af 92.6 ± 11.6 b 94.8 ± 13.0 cf
Hips, cm 99.52 ± 9.6 97.0 ± 9.2 abc 101.8 ± 10.2 a 102.1 ± 8.3 b 101.0 ± 9.2 c
Waist, >80 cm women, >94 cm men 636 (68.8) 233 (54.8) abc 166 (78.7) a 106 (84.8) b 131 (79.9) c
Thigh, cm 58.2 ± 5.9 58.4 ± 6.3 c 59.2 ± 5.7 e 58.5 ± 5.3 f 56.5 ± 5.1 cef
WHR 0.9 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.1 abc 0.9 ± 0.1 ae 0.9 ± 0.1 bf 0.9 ± 0.1 cef
WHR, ≥0.85 women, ≥0.9 men 464 (50.1%) 134 (31.5) abc 121 (57.3) ae 82 (65.1) b 127 (77.4) ae
FMI (kg/m2) 9.2 ± 3.5 8.0 ± 3.1 abc 10.3 ± 3.7 a 10.4 ± 3.4 b 10.1 ± 3.3 c
Total fat mass, kg 26.1 ± 9.2 23.1 ± 8.7 abc 28.8 ± 9.6 a 29.1 ± 8.2 b 27.9 ± 8.4 c
Total lean mass, kg 48.8 ± 10.6 48.2 ± 11.2 49.0 ± 9.7 49.5 ± 10.9 49.9 ± 9.7
Android fat mass, kg 2.4 ± 1.2 1.9 ± 1.1 acb 2.8 ± 1.2 a 2.9 ± 1.1 b 2.9 ± 1.2 c
Gynoid fat mass, kg 4.1 ± 1.4 3.9 ± 1.4 ab 4.3 ± 1.6 a 4.3 ± 1.3 b 3.9 ± 1.2
Gynoid lean mass, kg 7.2 ± 1.6 7.2 ± 1.7 7.2 ± 1.5 7.3 ± 1.6 7.4 ± 1.5
Legs fat mass, kg 7.7 ± 2.8 7.6 ± 2.8 8.2 ± 3.0 e 7.9 ± 2.6 f 7.1 ± 2.4 ef
Legs lean mass, kg 16.9 ± 4.0 1.7 ± 4.2 1.7 ± 3.8 1.7 ± 4.0 1.7 ± 3.8
Visceral mass, kg 1.2 ± 1.0 0.7 ± 0.7 abc 1.4 ± 0.9 ae 1.7 ± 1.0 b 1.9 ± 1.1 ce
A/G fat ratio 0.6 ± 0.2 0.5 ± 0.2 abc 0.6 ± 0.2 ae 0.7 ± 0.2 bf 0.8 ± 0.2 cef
Subjective well-being
SWLS 23.07 ± 5.30 23.6 ± 5.3 22.7 ± 5.0 22.8 ± 5.3 22.4 ±5.6
EQ-VAS 76.7 ± 14.7 80.9 ± 13.4 abc 76.3 ± 13.6 ae 72.6 ± 15.1 b 68.9 ce
BDI 7.02 ± 6.58 6.2 ± 6.3 bc 6.6 ± 5.7 e 8.0 ± 6.8 b 8.9 ± 7.7 ce

The data is shown as n (%), mean ± SD. A: android; BDI: Beck Depression Inventory; BMI: body mass index; EQ-VA: Euro Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale; FMI: fat mass index; G: gynoid; SD: standard deviation; SWLS: Satisfaction With Life Scale; WHR: waist-hip ratio; Comparisons variables between subgroups, the same letters in each row (a: between low and moderate CV risk classes; b: between low and high CV risk classes; c: between low and very-high CV risk classes; d: between moderate and high CV risk classes; e: between moderate and very-high CV risk classes; f: between high and very-high CV risk classes) represent significant differences at p < 0.05. No significant differences between the moderate and high risk groups are shown in bold.