Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 9;10(8):1584. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081584

Table 4.

The value of different predicting tools of the total population and of subgroup according cardiovascular risk and comparisons variables between subgroups.

CV Risk Calculators Total Population Cardiovascular Risk Class
Low Moderate High Very High
Pol-SCORE, % 4.0 ± 4.9 0.5 ± 0.3 abc 2.5 ± 1.1 ade 6.1 ± 2.3 bdf 15.3 ± 6.0 cef
FRS-Lipids, % 8.6 ± 8.2 2.4 ± 1.7 abc 8.6 ± 4.7 ade 13.3 ± 6.0 bdf 23.9 ± 7.1 cef
FRS-BMI, % 10.9 ± 9.6 3.2 ± 2.2 abc 11.9 ± 6.1 ade 17.7 ± 8.3 bdf 27.0 ± 5.3 cef
LIFE-CVD 10-year risk, % 4.9 ± 3.9 1.3 ± 0.7 abc 3.2 ± 1.4 ade 5.0 ± 1.7 bdf 10.1 ± 4.8 cef
LIFE-CVD Lifetime risk, % 17.3 ± 8.4 11.5 ± 3.4 abc 16.4 ± 6.7 ae 17.8 ± 8.4 bf 22.4 ± 10.2 cef

The data are shown as mean ± SD. BMI: body mass index; CV: cardiovascular; CVD: cardiovascular disease; FRS: Framingham Risk Score; LIFE-CVD: LIFEtime-perspective model for individualizing CardioVascular Disease prevention strategies in apparently healthy people; SCORE: Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation; SC: standard deviation. Comparisons variables between subgroups, the same letters in each row (a: between low and moderate CV risk classes; b: between low and high CV risk classes; c: between low and very-high CV risk classes; d: between moderate and high CV risk classes; e: between moderate and very-high CV risk classes; f: between high and very-high CV risk classes) represent significant differences at p < 0.05. No significant differences between the moderate and high risk groups are shown in bold.