Table 1.
Heading | Rationale |
---|---|
Paper number | A unique number for each planned paper. All within-team emails include in the subject line the name of the study and the paper number, e.g., NEON #9. The cell is colour coded to make an at-a-glance overview of progress easy: Green = has been submitted, meaning the intellectual work has been completed, so the remaining task for the lead author is revising or re-submitting as necessary Amber = currently being written Red = not started but next to be worked on by the lead author |
Provisional title | As close to a finalised title as possible—so not, e.g., ‘Qualitative study’. No hyphens in the title [29]. Use multiple keywords |
1st author | The person who will write, or co-ordinate the writing of, the text to produce a complete first draft |
Equal 1st author | An under-used option. Most journals allow this status, which is useful when authorship arrangements are complex such as in multi-site studies, and good for improving the CV of early career researchers |
Other co-authors | Populate early with complete list in order. Use ‘name tbc’ (to be confirmed) when awaiting approval for involvement |
Equal last author | Another under-used option which most journals allow and is useful for multi-site collaboration studies |
Target journal | Identify target journal, normally before writing any of the paper |
Status | Drop-down categories as shown in Table 2 |
Notes | Record target date for next milestone (e.g., ‘Full draft to co-authors by 22.1.22′) or submission history comprising submitted (‘S date’), revision requested (‘RR date’) and revision submitted (‘RS date’) details. Record previous rejections (‘No: journal name’) and future targets (‘Next: journal name’). For example: S 10.2.22, RR 11.6.22, RS 14.6.22, RR 1.7.22 No: Lancet Next: BMJ, American Journal of Psychiatry |