Table 3.
Association between the positive response to the DBPC gluten challenge and different variables in a multiple logistic regression model.
| Crude | Adjusted a | |
|---|---|---|
| OR; 95% CI, p | OR; 95% CI, p | |
| EAT-26 score | 0.87; 0.77–0.98, 0.022 | 0.87; 0.76–0.98, 0.021 |
| Mental health score | 1.28; 1.05–1.56, 0.011 | 1.30; 1.06–1.59, 0.009 |
| Gut microbiota | ||
| Bacteroides | 0.94; 0.88–1.00, 0.048 | 0.94; 0.88–1.00, 0.050 |
| Blautia | 1.20; 1.04–1.38, 0.008 | 1.23; 1.05–1.44, 0.009 |
| Dorea | 0.93; 0.84–1.04, 0.18 | 0.93; 0.83–1.03, 0.17 |
| Parabacteroides | 0.35; 0.16–0.76, 0.007 | 0.34; 0.15–0.76, 0.007 |
| Actinomyces b | 1.10; 0.94–1.27, 0.227 | 1.11; 0.95–1.31, 0.182 |
| Streptococcus c | Inf., p = 0.002 | Inf., p = 0.004 |
| Gut mycobiota | ||
| Debaryomyces b | 0.61; 0.22–1.71, 0.34 | 0.58; 0.19–1.83, 0.36 |
| Kluyveromyces | 3.05; 0.49–19.0, 0.22 | 2.89; 0.48–17.5, 0.25 |
| Rhodotorula b | 1.10; 0.96–1.27, 0.17 | 1.13; 0.96–1.34, 0.14 |
EAT-26, Eating Attitude Test-26. a Adjusted for age, gender, and education level. b Considering 0.01 of relative frequency as the unitary increase. c Since none among placebo-responsive individuals showed streptococci in their gut microbiota, the OR was = +∞; standard errors and p-values were computed by a resampling method (the jackknife technique).