Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 11;22(8):3944. doi: 10.3390/ijms22083944

Table 2.

Overall performance of the final linear models.

Classification a GA-LDA FS-LDA SFS-LDA
Sub-Training Test Validation Sub-Training Test Validation Sub-Training Test Validation
NDTotal b 2707 1160 1656 2707 1160 1656 2707 1160 1656
NDactive b 1027 459 620 1027 459 620 1027 459 620
CCDactive c 916 413 553 901 399 541 905 409 546
Sensitivity (%) 89.2 90.0 88.6 87.4 88.6 88.5 88.2 89.9 88.7
NDinactive b 1680 701 1036 1680 701 1036 1680 1680 1036
CCDinactive c 1472 626 918 1468 621 917 1481 630 919
Specificity (%) 87.6 89.3 89.2 87.7 86.9 87.3 88.1 89.1 88.1
F-measure 0.852 0.872 0.857 0.842 0.851 0.845 0.849 0.871 0.851
Accuracy (%) 88.2 89.6 88.8 87.5 87.9 88.0 88.1 89.6 88.5
MCC d 0.756 0.785 0.767 0.741 0.75 0.749 0.753 0.784 0.758

a LDA classification statistical parameters. b ND: Number of datapoints. c Correctly classified datapoints. d Matthews correlation coefficient.