Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 14;14(8):1964. doi: 10.3390/ma14081964

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Comparison of the compressive strength of the different inverse 3D printed scaffolds: (a) 500 µm pore size; (b) 750 µm pore size; (c) 1000 µm pore size; (d) comparison of the different pore sizes and strand widths; the measurements were performed on Zwick universal testing machine Z005; *—significant difference p < 0.05.