Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 14;10(4):604. doi: 10.3390/antiox10040604

Table 1.

Quality assessment of studies included in the systematic review using a modified Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for case–control studies [16] and cross-sectional studies [17].

Case–Control Studies
Authors Selection
(Max. 4 Stars)
Comparability
(Max. 2 Stars)
Exposure
(Max. 3 Stars)
Total Points
(Max. 9)
Quality
Balat et al. [18] 3 2 2 7 High
Duvan et al. [19] 3 2 2 7 High
Fathizadeh et al. [20] 3 2 2 7 High
Foster et al. [21] 3 2 2 7 High
Incebiyik et al. [22] 1 2 1 4 Medium
Tuladhar and Rao [23] 2 2 2 6 Medium
Cross-Sectional Studies
Authors Selection
(Max. 5 Stars)
Comparability
(Max. 2 Stars)
Outcome
(Max. 3 Stars)
Sum
(Max. 10)
Quality
Azizieh et al. [24] 1 2 2 5 Medium
Bahrami et al. [25] 3 2 3 8 High
Bahrami et al. [26] 2 2 3 7 High
Bertone-Johnson et al. [27] 2 2 3 7 High
Fatemi et al. [28] 2 0 3 5 Medium

Case–control studies (range of total points 0–9): 0 to 3 points—low-quality study, 4 to 6 points—medium-quality study, and 7 to 9 points—high-quality study. Cross-sectional studies (range of total points 0–10): 0 to 3 points—low-quality study, 4 to 6 points—medium-quality study, and 7 to 10 points—high-quality study.