Pathogenic criteria |
Very strong |
Reintroduced ACMG criterion for DCM gene specification |
PVS1 |
Null variant in LMNA or SCN5A
|
Strong |
none |
PS1 |
Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant |
none |
PS2 |
De novo (paternity confirmed) in a patient with disease and no family history |
none |
PS3 |
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect |
none |
PS4 |
Prevalence of variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared to controls OR variant identified in ≥15 probands with consistent phenotypes OR variant identified in ≥10 confirmed unlreated probands with consistent phenotypes |
none |
PP1_Strong |
Variant segregates in ≥7 meioses in DCM genes with established evidence |
Strength modification, DCM gene specification |
PVS1_Strong |
Null variant in FLNC, BAG3,and TTN A-band |
Moderate |
DCM gene specification |
PM1 |
Located in hotspot (For DCM, RBM20 exon 9, amino acids 634, 636, 637, 638) |
DCM gene specification, study specific |
PM2 |
Absent from gnomAD or at extremely low frequency in all gnomAD non-founder populations with available data |
Reintroduced ACMG criterion, DCM gene specification |
PM3 |
For recessive disorders, detected in transwith a pathogenic variant (rarely observed with TNNI3 and TNNT2 variants) |
none |
PM4 |
In-frame deletions/insertions of any size in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants |
none |
PM5 |
Different missense change at same amino acid residue previously established as pathogenic |
DCM specific |
PM6 |
De novo without confirmation of paternity (parental clinical data required) |
DCM gene specification |
PVS1_Moderate |
Null variant in gene with evidence supporting loss of function as disease mechanism (VCL, PLN, DSP) |
none |
PS4_Moderate |
Variant identified in ≥6 probands with consistent phenotypes |
none |
PP1_Moderate |
Variant segregates in ≥5 meioses in DCM genes with established evidence |
Supporting |
none |
PP1 |
Variant segregates in ≥3 meioses in DCM genes with established evidence |
Method specification |
PP3 |
Computational evidence support a deleterious effect (REVEL score >0.7) |
none |
PS4_Supporting |
Variant identified in ≥2 probands with consistent phenotypes |
Benign |
Stand alone |
none |
BA1 |
Variant allele frequency is >0.1% in any gnomaAD non-founder population |
DCM gene specification |
BP1_Stand_Alone |
Missense variant in TTN
|
Strong |
DCM gene specification, study specific |
BS1 |
Variant allele frequency is >0.05% in any gnomAD non-founder population |
none |
BS3 |
Well established in vitroor in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect |
none |
BS4 |
Non-segregation in affected members of a family |
Supporting |
none |
BP2 |
Observed as a compound heterozygote (in trans) or double heterozygote in genes with overlapping function |
Method specification |
BP4 |
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (REVEL score <0.15) |
Study specific |
BP7 |
Unlikely to affect protein function based on calculated Sequence Ontology terms for the transcript(s) of interest. |