Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 3;6(4):1066–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.01.025

Table 5.

Electron microscopic findings in participants

Variables Values
Avg GBM thickness (nm) 778.87 ± 198.33
GBM Lamina Densa remodeling (0/1/2/3), n (%) 27 (43.5)/24 (38.7)/2 (3.2)/9 (14.5)
GBM Duplication (0/1/2/3), n (%) 37 (59.7)/ 15 (24.2)/ 10 (16.1)/0
Avg FPW (μm) 1.87 ± 0.89
Foot process effacement (0–25%/25%–50%/50%–75%/75%–100%), n (%) 5 (8.1)/14 (22.6)/29 (46.8)/14 (22.6)
Endothelial fenestration loss (0/1/2/3), n (%) 6 (9.7)/ 35 (56.5)/ 17 (27.4)/ 4 (6.5)
Mesangial hyaline (0/1/2/3), n (%) 23 (37.1)/19 (30.6)/10 (16.1)/10 (16.1)
Mesangial matrix increase (0/1/2/3), n (%) 0/4 (6.5)/11 (17.7)/47 (75.8)

Avg FPW, average foot process width; Avg GBM, average glomerular basement membrane.