1. Acupuncture rationale |
1a) Style of acupuncture |
31 |
100.00 |
1.00 |
– |
1b) Reasoning for treatment provided |
24 |
77.42 |
1.00 |
– |
1c) Extent to which treatment was varied |
4 |
12.90 |
0.43 |
0 to 0.89 |
2. Details of needling |
2a) Number of needle insertions per subject per session |
23 |
74.19 |
0.83 |
0.61 to 1.00 |
2b) Names of points used |
23 |
74.19 |
0.67 |
0.39 to 0.95 |
2c) Depth of insertion |
17 |
54.84 |
0.74 |
0.52 to 0.97 |
2d) Response sought |
16 |
51.61 |
0.81 |
0.61 to 1.00 |
2e) Needle stimulation |
19 |
61.29 |
0.49 |
0.23 to 0.75 |
2f) Needle retention time |
30 |
96.77 |
0.65 |
0.02 to 1.00 |
2g) Needle type |
24 |
77.42 |
0.74 |
0.46 to 1.00 |
3. Treatment regimen |
3a) Number of treatment sessions |
28 |
90.32 |
0.52 |
0.04 to 0.99 |
3b) Frequency and duration of treatment sessions |
29 |
93.55 |
0.48 |
0 to 1.00 |
4. Other components of treatment |
4a) Details of other interventions administered to the acupuncture group |
22 |
70.97 |
0.53 |
0.21 to 0.86 |
4b) Setting and context of treatment |
12 |
38.71 |
0.79 |
0.57 to 1.00 |
5. Practitioner background |
5) Description of participating acupuncturists |
13 |
41.94 |
0.48 |
0.18 to 0.78 |
6. Control or comparator interventions |
6a) Rationale for the control or comparator in the context of the research question, with sources that justify this choice |
20 |
64.52 |
0.86 |
0.67 to 1.00 |
6b) Precise description of the control or comparator |
25 |
80.65 |
0.59 |
0.23 to 0.95 |