Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 21;14:1141–1151. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S308006

Table 3.

The Details of OQS Assessed with STRICTA Statement (n=31)

Items Item Details No. of Positive RCTs % Cohen’s κ 95% CI
1. Acupuncture rationale 1a) Style of acupuncture 31 100.00 1.00
1b) Reasoning for treatment provided 24 77.42 1.00
1c) Extent to which treatment was varied 4 12.90 0.43 0 to 0.89
2. Details of needling 2a) Number of needle insertions per subject per session 23 74.19 0.83 0.61 to 1.00
2b) Names of points used 23 74.19 0.67 0.39 to 0.95
2c) Depth of insertion 17 54.84 0.74 0.52 to 0.97
2d) Response sought 16 51.61 0.81 0.61 to 1.00
2e) Needle stimulation 19 61.29 0.49 0.23 to 0.75
2f) Needle retention time 30 96.77 0.65 0.02 to 1.00
2g) Needle type 24 77.42 0.74 0.46 to 1.00
3. Treatment regimen 3a) Number of treatment sessions 28 90.32 0.52 0.04 to 0.99
3b) Frequency and duration of treatment sessions 29 93.55 0.48 0 to 1.00
4. Other components of treatment 4a) Details of other interventions administered to the acupuncture group 22 70.97 0.53 0.21 to 0.86
4b) Setting and context of treatment 12 38.71 0.79 0.57 to 1.00
5. Practitioner background 5) Description of participating acupuncturists 13 41.94 0.48 0.18 to 0.78
6. Control or comparator interventions 6a) Rationale for the control or comparator in the context of the research question, with sources that justify this choice 20 64.52 0.86 0.67 to 1.00
6b) Precise description of the control or comparator 25 80.65 0.59 0.23 to 0.95