Table 3.
Dataset | Main effect | Interactions | Multiple comparisons | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F (DFn,DFd) | p-value | F (DFn,DFd) | p-value | Effect | Groups | p-value | |
Flow cytometry data analysis for T-cells from popliteal and inguinal lymph nodes | |||||||
CD4+ males | Treatment: F (1, 10) = 3.139 | 0.1069 | F (1, 10) = 0.3061 | 0.5922 | N/A | ||
Genotype: F (1, 10) = 0.6463 | 0.4401 | ||||||
CD4+CCR7+ males | Treatment: F (1, 10) = 0.1196 | 0.7367 | F (1, 10) = 0.1991 | 0.6650 | Treatment | Vehicle | 0.0814 |
Paclitaxel | 0.2116 | ||||||
Genotype: F (1, 10) = 11.86 | 0.0063 | Genotype | WT | 0.9514 | |||
eIF4ES209A | 0.9998 | ||||||
CD4+CD44±CD25± males | Cell populations: F (2, 30) = 809.1 | <0.0001 | F (6, 30) = 0.2916 | 0.9362 | No genotype or treatment difference within CD4+CD44+CD25-, CD4+CD44-CD25+, or CD4+CD44+CD25+ populations. | ||
Genotype-treatment: F (3, 30) = 0.6686 | 0.5780 | ||||||
CD4+ females | Treatment: F (1, 10) = 17.44 | 0.0019 | F (1, 10) = 3.920 | 0.0759 | Treatment | Vehicle | 0.3920 |
Paclitaxel | 0.6742 | ||||||
Genotype: F (1, 10) = 0.1340 | 0.7219 | Genotype | WT | 0.0101 | |||
eIF4ES209A | 0.3831 | ||||||
CD4+CCR7+ females | Treatment: F (1, 10) = 0.0027 | 0.9591 | F (1, 10) = 0.0341 | 0.8571 | Treatment | Vehicle | 0.3583 |
Paclitaxel | 0.2532 | ||||||
Genotype: F (1, 10) = 6.933 | 0.0250 | Genotype | WT | 0.9985 | |||
eIF4ES209A | 0.9996 | ||||||
CD4+CD44±CD25± females | Cell populations: F (2, 30) = 1893 | <0.0001 | F (6, 30) = 2.406 | 0.0512 | CD4+CD44+CD25- Genotype ns | ||
Genotype-treatment: F (3, 30) = 2.452 | 0.0827 | CD4+CD44+CD25- Treatment | Vehicle | 0.0011 | |||
Paclitaxel | 0.7767 | ||||||
CD8+ males | Treatment: F (1, 10) = 3.180 | 0.1049 | F (1, 10) = 0.5157 | 0.4891 | N/A | ||
Genotype: F (1, 10) = 0.6004 | 0.4564 | ||||||
CD8+CCR7+ males | Treatment: F (1, 10) = 0.0917 | 0.7681 | F (1, 10) = 0.1555 | 0.7016 | Treatment | Vehicle | 0.0433 |
Paclitaxel | 0.1044 | ||||||
Genotype: F (1, 10) = 16.48 | 0.0023 | Genotype | WT | >0.9999 | |||
eIF4ES209A | 0.9491 | ||||||
CD8+CD44±CD25± males | Cell populations: F (2, 30) = 772.5 | <0.0001 | F (6, 30) = 1.591 | 0.1842 | CD8+CD44+CD25- Genotype ns | ||
Genotype-treatment: F (3, 30) = 1.096 | 0.3660 | CD8+CD44+CD25-Treatment | Vehicle | 0.1579 | |||
Paclitaxel | 0.0396 | ||||||
CD8+ females | Treatment: F (1, 10) = 5.496 | 0.0410 | F (1, 10) = 3.684 | 0.0839 | Treatment | Vehicle | 0.6174 |
Paclitaxel | 0.4863 | ||||||
Genotype: F (1, 10) = 0.0273 | 0.8720 | Genotype | WT | 0.0730 | |||
eIF4ES209A | 0.9875 | ||||||
CD8+CCR7± females | Treatment: F (1, 10) = 0.1574 | 0.6999 | F (1, 10) = 0.0371 | 0.8510 | Treatment | Vehicle | 0.1422 |
Paclitaxel | 0.2125 | ||||||
Genotype: F (1, 10) = 10.15 | 0.0097 | Genotype | WT | 0.9991 | |||
eIF4ES209A | 0.9681 | ||||||
CD8+CD44±CD25± females | Cell populations: F (2, 30) = 788.2 | <0.0001 | F (6, 30) = 0.7166 | 0.6392 | No genotype or treatment difference within CD8+CD44+CD25-, CD8+CD44-CD25+, or CD8+CD44+CD25+ populations. | ||
Genotype-treatment: F (3, 30) = 0.5383 | 0.6597 | ||||||
Flow cytometry data analysis for myeloid cells from DRG | |||||||
Males CD11b+CD45+CD40±MHCII± | Cell populations: F (2, 24) = 84.59 | <0.0001 | F (6, 24) = 1.803 | 0.1410 | CD40+MHCII+ Treatment ns | ||
Genotype-treatment: F (3, 24) = 1.139 | 0.3535 | CD40+MHCII+ Genotype | WT | 0.4651 | |||
eIF4ES209A | 0.0275 | ||||||
Females CD11b+CD45+CD40±MHCII± | Cell populations: F (2, 24) = 141.3 | <0.0001 | F (6, 24) = 4.720 | 0.0026 | CD40+MHCII+ Treatment | Vehicle | 0.0140 |
Paclitaxel | 0.0055 | ||||||
Genotype-treatment: F (3, 24) = 5.042 | 0.0075 | CD40+MHCII+ Genotype | WT | 0.5182 | |||
eIF4ES209A | <0.0001 |
Two-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey’s post-hoc for multiple comparisons between genotypes and treatments for each sex. p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant (bolded).