Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 12;118(16):e2015821118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2015821118

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Comparison between the traditional CDD model for predicting DFS and the CDD model modified to include wind speed (CDDWS). (A, D, and G) Frequency of significant observations, RMSE (days), and the AICc using ground data, respectively. (B, E, and H) Frequency of significant observations, RMSE, and AICc using flux data, respectively. (C, F, and I) Frequency of significant observations, RMSE, and AICc for the NDVI3g data, respectively. (J and K) Differences between projected DFS using CDD and CDDWS under scenarios of RCP 4.5 (J) and RCP 8.5 (K), respectively. (L) Difference between projected DFS using CDDWS under the RCP 4.5 and the RCP 8.5. Significance was set at P < 0.05.