Table A1.
Friedman Test (Significance Level of 0.05) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Statistic | p-value | Result | |
360.428080 | 0.00000 | H0 is rejected | |
Friedman Value | Algorithm | Ranking | |
3.44875 | SVM | 1 | |
3.45125 | RF | 2 | |
3.48317 | LR | 3 | |
3.49475 | DT | 4 | |
3.51025 | NB | 5 | |
3.61317 | KNN | 6 | |
Post-Hoc Analysis (Significance Level of 0.05) | |||
Comparison | Statistic | p-value | Result |
KNN vs. SVM | 4.16872 | 0.00046 | H0 is rejected |
KNN vs. RF | 4.10534 | 0.00057 | H0 is rejected |
KNN vs. LR | 3.29610 | 0.01274 | H0 is rejected |
KNN vs. DT | 3.00241 | 0.03214 | H0 is rejected |
KNN vs. NB | 2.60941 | 0.09977 | H0 is accepted |
NB vs. SVM | 1.55931 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
NB vs. RF | 1.49592 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
DT vs. SVM | 1.16631 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
RF vs. DT | 1.10293 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
LR vs. SVM | 0.87262 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
RF vs. LR | 0.80924 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
NB vs. LR | 0.68669 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
NB vs. DT | 0.39300 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
LR vs. DT | 0.29369 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
RF vs. SVM | 0.06339 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |