Table A2.
Friedman test results and post-hoc analysis for the first-level model.
| Friedman Test (Significance Level of 0.05) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Statistic | p-value | Result | |
| 361.260066 | 0.00000 | H0 is rejected | |
| Friedman Value | Algorithm | Ranking | |
| 3.42083 | RF | 1 | |
| 3.44033 | DT | 2 | |
| 3.47883 | SVR | 3 | |
| 3.48183 | LR | 4 | |
| 3.56733 | NB | 5 | |
| 3.61133 | KNN | 6 | |
| Post-Hoc Analysis (Significance Level of 0.05) | |||
| Comparison | Statistic | p-value | Result |
| KNN vs. RF | 4.83006 | 0.00002 | H0 is rejected |
| KNN vs. DT | 4.33564 | 0.00020 | H0 is rejected |
| NB vs. RF | 3.71445 | 0.00265 | H0 is rejected |
| KNN vs. SVR | 3.35949 | 0.00937 | H0 is rejected |
| KNN vs. LR | 3.28342 | 0.01128 | H0 is rejected |
| NB vs. DT | 3.22004 | 0.01282 | H0 is rejected |
| NB vs. SVR | 2.24388 | 0.22356 | H0 is accepted |
| NB vs. LR | 2.16782 | 0.24138 | H0 is accepted |
| RF vs. LR | 1.54663 | 0.85366 | H0 is accepted |
| RF vs. SVR | 1.47057 | 0.85366 | H0 is accepted |
| KNN vs. NB | 1.11560 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
| LR vs. DT | 1.05222 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
| DT vs. SVR | 0.97615 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
| RF vs. DT | 0.49442 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |
| LR vs. SVR | 0.07606 | 1.00000 | H0 is accepted |